Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Povidone Iodine Rectal Preparation at Time of Prostate Needle Biopsy is a Simple and Reproducible Means to Reduce Risk of Procedural Infection
Published on: September 21, 2015
Maximal sterile barrier precautions do not reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections in general surgery units: a
Yoshinori Ishikawa1, Teruo Kiyama, Yoshio Haga
1Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Objective:
To investigate whether maximal sterile barrier precautions (MSBPs) during central venous catheter (CVC) insertion are truly effective in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) in patients in general surgical units.
Summary Background Data:
The reported effectiveness of MSBPs was based on the results of a single-center randomized controlled trial by Raad et al and the majority of the patients (99%) in the study were chemotherapy outpatients.
Methods:
Between March 14, 2004 and December 28, 2006, the patients scheduled for CVC insertion in surgical units at 9 medical centers in Japan were randomly assigned to either an MSBP group (n = 211) or a standard sterile barrier precaution (SSBP) group (n = 213). This study was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (registration ID number: UMIN000001400).
Results:
The median (range) duration of catheterization was 14 days (0-92 days) in the MSBP group and 14 days (0-112 days) in the SSBP group. There were 5 cases (2.4%) of CRBSI in the MSBP group and 6 cases (2.8%) in the SSBP group (relative risk, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-2.7; P = 0.77). The rate of CRBSIs per 1000 catheter days was 1.5 in the MSBP group and 1.6 in the SSBP group. There were 8 cases (3.8%) of catheter-related infections in the MSBP group and 7 cases (3.3%) in the SSBP group (relative risk, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-3.1; P = 0.78). The rate of catheter-related infection per 1000 catheter days was 2.4 in the MSBP group and 1.9 in the SSBP group.
Conclusions:
This study is larger in sample size than the one performed by Raad et al and could not demonstrate better prevention of CRBSIs by MSBP compared with SSBP. A large randomized controlled trial or at least a meta-analysis of any other studies in the literature is necessary to reach to a conclusion on this issue.
Insights
Maximal sterile barrier precautions (MSBPs) did not show a significant benefit in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) compared to standard precautions in surgical patients. Further large-scale trials are needed to confirm these findings for central venous catheter insertions.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Surgical Patient Care
- Healthcare-Associated Infections
Background:
- Previous evidence on maximal sterile barrier precautions (MSBPs) for preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) primarily comes from a single-center trial focusing on chemotherapy outpatients.
- The generalizability of MSBPs' effectiveness to diverse patient populations, such as those in general surgical units, remains uncertain.
- This study addresses the need for evidence in surgical settings, where central venous catheter (CVC) use is common.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of maximal sterile barrier precautions (MSBPs) versus standard sterile barrier precautions (SSBP) in preventing CRBSIs during central venous catheter (CVC) insertion.
- To assess the impact of MSBPs on overall catheter-related infections in patients within general surgical units.
- To provide robust data for clinical practice guidelines regarding CVC insertion protocols.
Main Methods:
- A multi-center randomized controlled trial involving 424 patients undergoing CVC insertion in surgical units across 9 Japanese medical centers.
- Patients were randomized to either MSBP (n=211) or SSBP (n=213) groups.
- Data collection focused on CRBSI rates, other catheter-related infections, and duration of catheterization.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant difference in CRBSI rates between the MSBP and SSBP groups (2.4% vs. 2.8%, P=0.77).
- CRBSI rates per 1000 catheter days were similar: 1.5 for MSBP and 1.6 for SSBP.
- Overall catheter-related infection rates also showed no significant difference (3.8% vs. 3.3%, P=0.78).
Conclusions:
- This larger study could not confirm the superior efficacy of MSBPs over SSBP in preventing CRBSIs in general surgical patients.
- The findings suggest that MSBPs may not offer additional benefits compared to SSBP in this specific patient population.
- Further large-scale randomized controlled trials or meta-analyses are warranted to definitively establish the role of MSBPs in CRBSI prevention.
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Asepsis
Cleaning, Sterilization, and Disinfection
Cleaning
The cleaning process usually involves using water with detergents or enzymatic cleaner and removing foreign material from objects and surfaces, including organic material such as body fluids or inorganic material like soil. Cleaning is performed before high-level disinfection and sterilization because foreign materials on the cover of the devices interfere with process...
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...