Maximal sterile barrier precautions do not reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections in general surgery units: a

Yoshinori Ishikawa1, Teruo Kiyama, Yoshio Haga

  • 1Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.

Annals of Surgery
|March 13, 2010
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Maximal sterile barrier precautions (MSBPs) did not show a significant benefit in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) compared to standard precautions in surgical patients. Further large-scale trials are needed to confirm these findings for central venous catheter insertions.

Area of Science:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Surgical Patient Care
  • Healthcare-Associated Infections

Background:

  • Previous evidence on maximal sterile barrier precautions (MSBPs) for preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) primarily comes from a single-center trial focusing on chemotherapy outpatients.
  • The generalizability of MSBPs' effectiveness to diverse patient populations, such as those in general surgical units, remains uncertain.
  • This study addresses the need for evidence in surgical settings, where central venous catheter (CVC) use is common.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of maximal sterile barrier precautions (MSBPs) versus standard sterile barrier precautions (SSBP) in preventing CRBSIs during central venous catheter (CVC) insertion.
  • To assess the impact of MSBPs on overall catheter-related infections in patients within general surgical units.
  • To provide robust data for clinical practice guidelines regarding CVC insertion protocols.

Main Methods:

  • A multi-center randomized controlled trial involving 424 patients undergoing CVC insertion in surgical units across 9 Japanese medical centers.
  • Patients were randomized to either MSBP (n=211) or SSBP (n=213) groups.
  • Data collection focused on CRBSI rates, other catheter-related infections, and duration of catheterization.

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant difference in CRBSI rates between the MSBP and SSBP groups (2.4% vs. 2.8%, P=0.77).
  • CRBSI rates per 1000 catheter days were similar: 1.5 for MSBP and 1.6 for SSBP.
  • Overall catheter-related infection rates also showed no significant difference (3.8% vs. 3.3%, P=0.78).

Conclusions:

  • This larger study could not confirm the superior efficacy of MSBPs over SSBP in preventing CRBSIs in general surgical patients.
  • The findings suggest that MSBPs may not offer additional benefits compared to SSBP in this specific patient population.
  • Further large-scale randomized controlled trials or meta-analyses are warranted to definitively establish the role of MSBPs in CRBSI prevention.

Related Concept Videos

Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures01:22

Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures

Essential infection prevention measures are based on the knowledge of the infection chain, the modes of transmission in healthcare settings, and the use of the best practices in all healthcare settings. Compulsory public reporting of healthcare-associated infection rates is needed to allow individuals and the community to make informed choices regarding selecting a healthcare facility.
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Standard Precaution01:26

Standard Precaution

Standard precautions are the minimum infection control safeguards used while caring for all patients, irrespective of their disease condition. They help prevent the spread of common infectious microorganisms to healthcare workers, patients, and visitors in all healthcare settings.
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Asepsis01:28

Asepsis

The condition of being free from disease-causing living pathogens is asepsis. Aseptic techniques include a set of standard practices to achieve asepsis. An example is the regular environmental cleaning of all parts of the healthcare facility and hand hygiene at home before preparing or eating food. Medical and surgical asepsis in healthcare practice protects patients from harmful pathogens, minimizes the risk of contamination of susceptible sites, and reduces the risk of infection transmission.
Cleaning, Sterilization, and Disinfection01:30

Cleaning, Sterilization, and Disinfection

Cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization are the methods that help to break the infection chain and prevent disease.
Cleaning
The cleaning process usually involves using water with detergents or enzymatic cleaner and removing foreign material from objects and surfaces, including organic material such as body fluids or inorganic material like soil. Cleaning is performed before high-level disinfection and sterilization because foreign materials on the cover of the devices interfere with process...
Hand hygiene01:23

Hand hygiene

Asepsis is the practice of preventing or breaking the chain of infection. The nurse employs aseptic techniques to prevent the spread of microorganisms and reduce the risk of diseases. Hand hygiene is the cornerstone of aseptic techniques and is classified into medical and surgical asepsis. Medical asepsis includes hand hygiene and the use of gloves. Surgical asepsis, or the sterile technique, refers to practices that render and keep objects and areas free of microorganisms.
Hand washing...