Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p ≠ 0.5.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Early life adversity and polycystic ovary syndrome among North American pregnancy planners.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same author

Home Pregnancy Test Sensitivity by Test Timing and Cycle Length with Real-World Use Among Pregnancy Planners who Conceived.

Fertility and sterility·2026
Same author

Cardiometabolic diseases and risk of early-onset dementia: a population-based case-control study in Northern Italy.

Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD·2026
Same author

A prospective study of periconceptional perceived stress and rate of miscarriage.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Pregnancy Test Use and Timing of Pregnancy Detection in a Prospective Cohort of Pregnancy Planners.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same author

Environmental Factors and Risk of Early-Onset Dementia: A Population-Based Case-Control Study.

Neuroepidemiology·2025
Same journal

Re: "Does tattoo exposure increase the risk of cutaneous melanoma? A population-based case-control study".

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Separability and identifiability as primary obstacles to substantively useful mediation analysis.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Intergenerational income mobility and psychotropic drug dispensation in a 1953 Stockholm cohort: a diagonal reference model approach.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Genetic risk score to enhance glaucoma case detection: a prospective double-blind screening study (EyeLife) in the population-based Lifelines cohort.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Different risks, same causes: educational attainment influences when, not from what, we die.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Loneliness around the world: patterns, predictors, and well-being implications.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Curbing type I and type II errors

Kenneth J Rothman1

  • 1RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. krothman@rti.org

European Journal of Epidemiology
|March 17, 2010
PubMed
Summary

No abstract available in PubMed .

More Related Videos

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020