Newborn hearing screening and follow-up: are children receiving recommended services?

Marcus Gaffney1, Denise R Green, Claudia Gaffney

  • 1centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. MGaffney@cdc.gov

Insights

Newborn hearing screening is widespread, but many infants who don't pass are lost to follow-up. Improving documentation and intervention is crucial for early hearing loss detection.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Pediatrics
  • Audiology

Background:

  • Newborn hearing screening programs are established nationwide to identify infant hearing loss and prevent developmental delays.
  • The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) monitors these programs to track progress towards national objectives.
  • Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) initiatives aim to ensure timely diagnosis and support for infants with hearing impairments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize findings from the CDC's EHDI Hearing Screening and Follow-up Survey (HSFS) for 2005-2006.
  • To assess progress in identifying infants with hearing loss in the U.S.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of current screening and intervention pathways.

Main Methods:

  • The HSFS collected aggregate data on screening, diagnosis, intervention, and demographics from U.S. EHDI programs.
  • Data from 2005 and 2006 were analyzed to evaluate progress toward national hearing screening goals.
  • The survey focused on tracking infants through the screening and diagnostic process.

Main Results:

  • Over 90% of infants were screened for hearing loss in 2005 and 2006.
  • Approximately 2% of infants did not pass their final screening.
  • A significant challenge identified was the high rate (two-thirds) of infants not documented with a diagnostic finding, largely due to loss to follow-up/loss to documentation (LFU/LTD).
  • While most infants with confirmed hearing loss received intervention, over 30% were lost to follow-up/documentation, hindering service confirmation.

Conclusions:

  • The HSFS provides valuable data on the progress of infant hearing screening programs.
  • Despite high screening rates, substantial improvements are necessary to reduce loss to follow-up/documentation.
  • Meeting national benchmarks requires enhanced efforts to ensure all infants receive timely diagnosis and intervention for hearing loss.
Abstract