Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

11:29
Surgical Techniques to Optimize Ovarian Reserve during Laparoscopic Cystectomy for Ovarian Endometrioma
Published on: January 22, 2022
Is staging beneficial for Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy? A systematic review
1Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
The Journal of Urology
|March 23, 2010
Summary
The 2-stage Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy offers a higher success rate for testicular viability compared to the single-stage approach. Further research with robust designs is recommended to confirm these findings in pediatric patients.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Urology
- Surgical Outcomes
Background:
- The Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy is a surgical technique used to treat high intra-abdominal testes.
- Testicular atrophy is a known complication of this procedure.
- The optimal approach, single-stage versus two-stage, remains debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and determine the comparative success rates of single-stage versus two-stage Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy.
- To assess testicular viability and position as primary outcomes.
- To evaluate the impact of surgical approach (laparoscopic vs. open) on outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies involving boys under 18 years.
- Inclusion of reports from electronic databases, clinical trial registries, and gray literature.
- Random effects models were used for meta-analysis, with heterogeneity assessed via forest plot and I² statistic.
Main Results:
- 61 articles were included from 1,807 citations.
- Pooled success rates were 80% for single-stage and 85% for two-stage Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy.
- The two-stage approach showed a significantly higher success rate (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.9).
- No difference in success rates was observed between laparoscopic and open techniques.
- Fewer complications were reported for the single-stage approach compared to the two-stage procedure.
Conclusions:
- The two-stage Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy demonstrates a higher success rate for testicular viability than the single-stage method.
- Both laparoscopic and open techniques yield similar success rates.
- The current evidence is of low quality, necessitating randomized controlled trials for definitive conclusions.

