Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
Published on: December 5, 2014
National red listing beyond the 2010 target
Tara J Zamin1, Jonathan E M Baillie, Rebecca M Miller
1Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, United Kingdom. tara.zamin@queensu.ca
National red lists (NRLs) are crucial for biodiversity monitoring but have significant geographic and taxonomic gaps, particularly in developing nations. Wealthier countries with less biodiversity have better NRL coverage, highlighting funding as a key conservation barrier.
Area of Science:
- Conservation Science
- Biodiversity Monitoring
- Environmental Policy
Background:
- National Red Lists (NRLs) are vital for tracking biodiversity status and trends, supporting international conservation targets like the 2010 Biodiversity Target.
- NRL data is increasingly important for national conservation priority setting and climate change adaptation strategies.
- Global assessments of NRL coverage are needed to identify gaps and guide future conservation investments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a global review of National Red Lists (NRLs) in 109 countries.
- To analyze geographic and taxonomic gaps in NRL coverage.
- To examine correlations between NRL comprehensiveness, GDP, and vertebrate species richness.
Main Methods:
- Global review of National Red Lists (NRLs) across 109 countries.
- Analysis of geographic and taxonomic gaps in NRL coverage.
- Statistical correlation analysis between NRL data, GDP, and vertebrate species richness.
Main Results:
- Significant geographic gaps in NRL coverage were identified in Oceania, middle Africa, the Caribbean, and western Africa.
- Major taxonomic gaps exist for invertebrates, fungi, and lichens.
- NRL comprehensiveness positively correlated with GDP and negatively with vertebrate species richness, indicating wealthier nations have better coverage despite lower biodiversity.
Conclusions:
- Regions with the highest biodiversity and greatest conservation needs often receive the least attention due to financial limitations.
- Improving NRL coverage requires targeted projects for underrepresented taxa/regions and capacity building for countries to develop their own lists.
- Enhanced knowledge transfer within and across regions is a priority for future investment in biodiversity monitoring.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
SI Units: 2019 Redefinition
A standard set of units has been defined to...
Targets for Drug Action: Overview
Receptors are either membrane-spanning or intracellular proteins, which upon binding a ligand, get activated and transmit the signal downstream to elicit a response. Drugs bind receptors, either mimicking the action of endogenous ligands or blocking the receptor activity to bring about a modified response. Nearly 35% of approved drugs target the G...
Threats to Biodiversity
Conservation of Declining Populations
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
