Related Experiment Videos

Vitamin K to neonates. Peroral versus intramuscular administration

F S Jørgensen1, P Felding, S Vinther

  • 1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Insights

Oral vitamin K is as effective as an injection for preventing newborn bleeding. This study found no significant differences in coagulation factors or bleeding events between the two vitamin K administration methods.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal Medicine
  • Pediatric Hematology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Hemorrhagic disease of the newborn (HDN) is a serious condition.
  • Vitamin K prophylaxis at birth is standard practice to prevent HDN.
  • The optimal route of vitamin K administration is debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of oral versus intramuscular vitamin K in preventing HDN.
  • To evaluate biochemical markers of coagulation in newborns receiving different vitamin K formulations.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized study involving 300 infants.
  • Comparison of 1 mg peroral vitamin K versus 1 mg intramuscular vitamin K at birth.
  • Measurement of coagulation factors II, VII, and X activity, prothrombin antigen, and PIVKA II.
  • Observation for bleeding events until hospital discharge.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences were observed in any biochemical markers between the oral and intramuscular vitamin K groups.
  • Narrow 95% confidence intervals for all measured coagulation factors.
  • Zero cases of bleeding were reported in either group.

Conclusions:

  • Peroral administration of 1 mg vitamin K is as effective as intramuscular injection for preventing classical HDN.
  • Oral vitamin K is a viable and safe alternative for neonatal prophylaxis.

Related Concept Videos