Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Random Error

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Design Consideration

Design Consideration

Designing a structure involves a series of considerations, primarily the material's ultimate strength, calculated through tests that measure changes under increased force until the material reaches its breaking point or limit. The ultimate load, where the material breaks, is divided by its original cross-sectional area, resulting in the ultimate normal stress or strength. The ultimate shearing stress is another significant factor taken into account.
The factor of safety is another key aspect...

Root-Locus Method

Root-Locus Method

A cruise control system in a car is designed to maintain a specified speed automatically by adjusting the gas pedal. The system continuously measures the vehicle's speed and makes fine adjustments to the pedal to achieve this goal. The root locus method is particularly useful for understanding how the cruise control system's behavior changes under varying conditions, such as when the car goes uphill, downhill, or faces strong wind resistance.
This system can be represented by a block diagram,...

Hazard Rate

Hazard Rate

The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Correction: Probiotics and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants after the food and drug administration warning actions.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2026

Same author

Assessing the HIV prevention needs of transgender men and non-binary people who have sex with men: an analysis of repeated, cross-sectional behavioural surveillance, 2019-2023.

Sexual health·2026

Same author

Characterizing Documented Psychosocial Stressors in Pediatric Psychiatric Emergencies with an Open-Weight Large Language Model.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026

Same author

Probiotics and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants after the food and drug administration warning actions.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2026

Same author

Integrated CPR coach and compressor training improves CPR quality in a pediatric emergency department.

Resuscitation·2026

Same author

Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group Consensus Statement on Reirradiation With Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer.

International journal of particle therapy·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Random safety auditing, root cause analysis, failure mode and effects analysis.

Robert Ursprung¹, James Gray

¹Pediatrix Medical Group, Cook Children's Medical Center, Department of Neonatology, 801 Seventh Avenue, Fort Worth, TX 76104, USA. robert_ursprung@pediatrix.com

Clinics in Perinatology

|April 6, 2010

Summary

Healthcare quality and patient safety are critical. Neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) face high medical error risks. Combining failure mode and effects analysis, root cause analysis, and safety audits improves NICU care delivery.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Healthcare Quality Improvement
Patient Safety
Neonatal Medicine

Background:

Medical errors and quality issues are significant causes of morbidity and mortality in healthcare.
Neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are identified as high-risk environments for serious medical errors.
Effective quality-assurance monitoring is essential for ensuring safe healthcare practices.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the effectiveness of specific quality-assurance techniques in enhancing patient safety within the NICU.
To identify robust methods for system analysis and redesign in complex healthcare settings like the NICU.

Main Methods:

Utilized failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) for proactive risk identification.
Employed root cause analysis (RCA) to investigate adverse events and system vulnerabilities.
Implemented random safety auditing to monitor adherence to safe practices.

Main Results:

The integrated application of FMEA, RCA, and safety auditing proved effective in analyzing healthcare systems.
These combined techniques facilitate system redesign aimed at improving the safety of care delivery.
The study highlights the utility of these methods in the complex NICU environment.

Conclusions:

A combination of FMEA, RCA, and safety auditing offers a powerful approach to improving quality and safety in healthcare.
These methodologies are particularly valuable for complex systems such as the NICU.
Implementing these quality-assurance tools supports the safe delivery of care and reduces medical errors.