Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quality Improvement Summit 2016: Shared Decision Making and Prostate Cancer Screening.

Urology practice·2023
Same author

Type 2 diabetes patient activation and mHealth interventions decreased cardiovascular disease risk.

The American journal of managed care·2022
Same author

Improving diabetic patients' adherence to treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease (Office Guidelines Applied to Practice-IMPACT Study)-a cluster randomized controlled effectiveness trial.

Trials·2022
Same author

Head to head randomized trial of two decision aids for prostate cancer.

BMC medical informatics and decision making·2021
Same author

Racial differences in veterans' response to a standard vs. patient-centered decision aid for prostate cancer: Implications for decision making in African American and White men.

Patient education and counseling·2020
Same author

Blood Pressure Control in Hypertensive Patients in Federally Qualified Health Centers: Impact of Shared Decision Making in the Office-GAP Program.

MDM policy & practice·2018
Same journal

Evaluating Restraint and Seclusion as Care Processes Rather Than Compliance Metrics.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Burden in Informal Caregivers of Palliative Care Patients With Pressure Injuries: Perceived Social Support and Influencing Factors Care Burden in Palliative Caregivers.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Organisational Problems, Role Stress, and Job Satisfaction Among Emergency Department Workers: A Multicenter Mixed-Effects Study.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Highlighting a Systemic Bias in the Responder Odds Ratio.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Epistemological Issues in Clinical Reasoning: A Scoping Review.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

An Evaluation of AI-Generated Clinical Notes in the OpenNotes Era: A Thematic Analysis of Clinician Discourse.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Prudent evidence-fettered shared decision making.

Elizabeth Libby Bogdan-Lovis1, Margaret Holmes-Rovner

  • 1Center for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA. libby.bogdan@ht.msu.edu

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
|April 7, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) faces criticism but remains resilient. Social sciences can inform EBM policy by addressing healthcare resource consumption through shared decision-making strategies, suggesting a frugal default option.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Health Policy
  • Medical Ethics
  • Social Sciences

Background:

  • Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is a widely discussed but often criticized medical approach.
  • The integration of social sciences within EBM is a subject of ongoing debate.
  • Understanding human behavior is crucial for effective healthcare policy and resource management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore how social sciences can inform evidence-based medicine (EBM) policy.
  • To examine the ethical considerations of unlimited healthcare resource consumption.
  • To propose strategies for resource-preserving shared decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the intersection between EBM and social science perspectives.
  • Focus on ethical dilemmas in healthcare resource allocation.
  • Development of policy-influencing strategies for shared decision-making.

Main Results:

  • Social sciences offer valuable insights into EBM-mediated human interactions.
  • Unlimited consumption of healthcare resources presents an ethical challenge.
  • Shared decision-making can promote resource preservation.

Conclusions:

  • Social sciences can illuminate policy implications within EBM.
  • A frugal default option in healthcare decision-making warrants further investigation.
  • Integrating social science perspectives can enhance EBM's effectiveness and ethical considerations.