Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Community-driven advances in computational mass spectrometry: The perspective of EuBIC-MS members.

Journal of proteomics·2026
Same author

Hierarchy of MS-Based Evidence.

Journal of proteome research·2026
Same author

bio.tools: an expanded web service for research software in the life sciences.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same author

Open and sustainable AI: challenges, opportunities and the road ahead in the life sciences.

Nature methods·2026
Same author

Tackling vaccine hyporesponsiveness through global collaboration, diverse population studies, and data integration.

The Lancet. Microbe·2025
Same author

Semantic annotation of Glycomics and Glycoproteomics methods.

Glycobiology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Metabolic Pathway Confirmation and Discovery Through 13C-labeling of Proteinogenic Amino Acids
07:26

Metabolic Pathway Confirmation and Discovery Through 13C-labeling of Proteinogenic Amino Acids

Published on: January 26, 2012

Quantitative metabolism using AMS: Choosing a labeled precursor.

Jennifer Links1, Magnus Palmblad, Ted Ognibene

  • 1Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94551, United States.

Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research. Section B, Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
|April 7, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Biological radioisotope studies can now use less material thanks to accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). This method allows for more accurate physiological condition studies using carbon-14 labeled glucose or nicotinic acid.

More Related Videos

Workflow Based on the Combination of Isotopic Tracer Experiments to Investigate Microbial Metabolism of Multiple Nutrient Sources
12:47

Workflow Based on the Combination of Isotopic Tracer Experiments to Investigate Microbial Metabolism of Multiple Nutrient Sources

Published on: January 22, 2018

A Strategy for Sensitive, Large Scale Quantitative Metabolomics
14:18

A Strategy for Sensitive, Large Scale Quantitative Metabolomics

Published on: May 27, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Metabolic Pathway Confirmation and Discovery Through 13C-labeling of Proteinogenic Amino Acids
07:26

Metabolic Pathway Confirmation and Discovery Through 13C-labeling of Proteinogenic Amino Acids

Published on: January 26, 2012

Workflow Based on the Combination of Isotopic Tracer Experiments to Investigate Microbial Metabolism of Multiple Nutrient Sources
12:47

Workflow Based on the Combination of Isotopic Tracer Experiments to Investigate Microbial Metabolism of Multiple Nutrient Sources

Published on: January 22, 2018

A Strategy for Sensitive, Large Scale Quantitative Metabolomics
14:18

A Strategy for Sensitive, Large Scale Quantitative Metabolomics

Published on: May 27, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Metabolic studies
  • Isotope tracing

Background:

  • Traditional radioisotope studies lack sensitivity, requiring high material quantities that exceed physiological levels.
  • This limits the ability to accurately replicate in vivo conditions.
  • Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) offers enhanced sensitivity for biological radioisotope studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare whole-cell labeling with carbon-14 glucose versus targeted pathway labeling with carbon-14 nicotinic acid.
  • To evaluate the benefits and limitations of each labeling strategy in preserving physiological conditions.
  • To assess the impact of labeled material choice on study interpretation and comprehensiveness.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) for highly sensitive detection of radioisotopes.
  • Performing biological studies with low levels of carbon-14 labeled glucose for whole-cell analysis.
  • Conducting studies with carbon-14 labeled nicotinic acid for targeted pathway analysis.

Main Results:

  • AMS enables radioisotope studies with significantly reduced labeled material, preserving physiological conditions.
  • Whole-cell labeling with (14)C-glucose and targeted pathway labeling with (14)C-nicotinic acid offer distinct advantages and limitations.
  • The choice of labeled material impacts the ease of data interpretation and the overall comprehensiveness of the study.

Conclusions:

  • AMS significantly improves the feasibility of biological radioisotope studies by allowing the use of physiologically relevant low-level tracers.
  • Both (14)C-glucose and (14)C-nicotinic acid labeling methods are viable, with the optimal choice depending on the specific research question.
  • Careful selection of the labeled material is crucial for maximizing the insights gained from sensitive radioisotope tracing experiments.