Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

11:25
Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery
Published on: October 11, 2010
Computer-based auditory training (CBAT): benefits for children with language- and reading-related learning
Jenny Hooi Yin Loo1, Doris-Eva Bamiou, Nicci Campbell
1The Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK. h.loo@ucl.ac.uk
Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology
|April 8, 2010
Summary
Computer-based auditory training shows limited benefits for children's language and reading skills, except for phonological awareness. Further research is needed to confirm its effectiveness for auditory processing disorder.
Area of Science:
- Auditory Neuroscience
- Developmental Psychology
- Educational Technology
Background:
- Children with language, reading, and learning difficulties often face challenges with auditory processing.
- Computer-based auditory training (CBAT) has been proposed as an intervention to address these difficulties.
- Evidence for the efficacy of CBAT, particularly commercial programs like Fast ForWord (FFW) and Earobics, requires systematic review.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and evaluate the evidence for CBAT in children with language, reading, and related learning difficulties.
- To assess the potential benefits of CBAT for children diagnosed with auditory processing disorder (APD).
- To rate the identified studies based on the American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) evidence hierarchy.
Main Methods:
- Searched literature for studies on CBAT published between 2000 and 2008.
- Included studies on commercial CBAT programs (FFW, Earobics) and other sound-based training methods.
- Rated study quality using the ASHA 2004 evidence hierarchy.
Main Results:
- FFW and Earobics showed minimal impact on language, spelling, and reading skills, with the exception of phonological awareness.
- Non-speech and simple speech sound training may improve reading skills when delivered via audio-visual methods.
- Preliminary evidence suggests CBAT might benefit children with auditory processing disorder (APD).
Conclusions:
- Current evidence indicates limited efficacy of FFW and Earobics for typical language and reading skill development in children.
- Audio-visual delivery of non-speech and simple speech sound training shows promise for reading improvement.
- Further rigorous research is essential to validate the preliminary findings on CBAT for auditory processing disorder.
