Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Pneumococcal vaccination at 65 years and vaccination coverage in at-risk adults: A retrospective population-based study in France.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Association of Complement Genetics with Outcomes in IgA Nephropathy.

Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN·2026
Same author

Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons versus Drug-Eluting Stents in Small Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia·2025
Same author

Potent P2Y<sub>12</sub> Inhibitor Monotherapy vs DAPT After PCI in Patients With and Without STEMI: The NEO-MINDSET Substudy.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2025
Same author

Optimizing ADAMTS13 prophylaxis to reduce relapse and organ failure in congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Blood advances·2025
Same author

Pneumococcal vaccination at 65 years and vaccination coverage in at-risk adults: A retrospective population-based study in France.

PloS one·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

Rationale and design for the PAINT randomized trial.

Pedro A Lemos1, Bruno Moulin, Marco A Perin

  • 1Instituto do Coração, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil. pedro.lemos@incor.usp.br

Arquivos Brasileiros De Cardiologia
|April 10, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The PAINT trial compared biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents (paclitaxel-eluting and sirolimus-eluting) against bare metal stents. It assessed safety and efficacy in de novo coronary lesions, evaluating restenosis rates.

More Related Videos

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments
09:03

Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments

Published on: May 21, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments
09:03

Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments

Published on: May 21, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • The PAINT trial investigated novel biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents.
  • These included paclitaxel-eluting and sirolimus-eluting formulations.
  • The study aimed to compare their performance against bare metal stents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate two new drug-eluting stent formulations.
  • To compare their efficacy against a bare metal stent.
  • To analyze outcomes between paclitaxel and sirolimus drug-eluting stents.

Main Methods:

  • A multicenter, 3-arm randomized trial involving 275 patients.
  • Patients received paclitaxel-eluting, sirolimus-eluting, or bare metal stents.
  • Primary endpoint: in-stent late loss at 9 months.

Main Results:

  • The trial design facilitated evaluation of safety and efficacy profiles.
  • Biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents were compared to bare metal stents.
  • Secondary analysis compared sirolimus versus paclitaxel drug-eluting stents.

Conclusions:

  • The PAINT trial assessed novel biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents.
  • It compared their safety and efficacy against bare metal stents.
  • The study also compared the anti-restenosis effects of sirolimus versus paclitaxel.