Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026
08:55
Determining and Controlling External Power Output During Regular Handrim Wheelchair Propulsion
Published on: February 5, 2020
Anthropometry and standards for wheeled mobility: an international comparison
Edward Steinfeld1, Jordana Maisel, David Feathers
1Center for Inclusive Design and Environmental Analysis, School of Architecture and Planning, State University of New York at Buffalo, New York 14214-3087, USA. arced@ap.buffalo.edu
Assistive Technology : the Official Journal of RESNA
|April 21, 2010
Summary
Current accessibility standards for wheeled mobility devices need updating. Research shows U.S. standards, based on 1970s data, do not reflect modern technology or user needs, highlighting the need for international collaboration.
Area of Science:
- Built environment accessibility research
- Human factors and ergonomics
- Disability studies and inclusive design
Background:
- Accessibility standards for the built environment are crucial for users of wheeled mobility devices.
- Current standards address clear floor areas, maneuvering clearances, and seat/knee clearances, referencing device dimensions.
- These standards are essential for ensuring equitable access in public and private spaces.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review international research on wheeled mobility device space requirements.
- To compare current accessibility standards with recent research findings.
- To identify necessary improvements for U.S. accessibility standards.
Main Methods:
- A review of recent research from four countries concerning wheeled mobility device space needs.
- Comparison of research findings with existing national accessibility standards.
- Evaluation of U.S. accessibility standards using ongoing anthropometry research data.
Main Results:
- Preliminary analysis indicates U.S. accessibility standards require updating.
- Existing U.S. standards, originating from 1970s research, do not account for advances in wheeled mobility technology.
- Demographic shifts in wheeled mobility users are not adequately addressed by current standards.
Conclusions:
- U.S. accessibility standards need revision to incorporate current research and user demographics.
- Integrating research directly into standards development is vital.
- International collaboration and the development of international standards are recommended.
