Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Assessment of complex environmental health problems: framing the structures and structuring the frameworks
Anne B Knol1, David J Briggs, Erik Lebret
1National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Environmental health research, PO Box 1, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands. Anne.knol@rivm.nl
Developing informed environmental policies requires understanding complex risks. Integrated environmental health impact assessment uses a proposed three-level taxonomy of conceptual frameworks to analyze these multifaceted issues and support better decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Health Sciences
- Policy Analysis
- Risk Assessment
Background:
- Environmental risks often present complex, far-reaching health consequences, challenging policy development.
- Integrated environmental health impact assessment (IEHIA) is crucial for addressing these complexities and uncertainties.
- A clear conceptual framework is essential for successful IEHIA, guiding issue definition, principles, stakeholder involvement, and data interpretation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a novel three-level taxonomy for conceptual frameworks in environmental health impact assessment.
- To provide a structured approach for defining and utilizing conceptual frameworks in policy-relevant environmental health research.
- To enhance the clarity and consistency of environmental health impact assessments.
Main Methods:
- Development of a three-level taxonomy: structural, relational, and operational frameworks.
- Description of the role and complementarity of each framework level in the assessment process.
- Illustration of the taxonomy using a case study of urban brownfield development for residential use.
Main Results:
- The proposed taxonomy categorizes conceptual frameworks into structural (context), relational (causal links), and operational (analytical models) levels.
- Each framework level serves distinct but complementary roles throughout the environmental health impact assessment process.
- The taxonomy provides a tool for making assumptions explicit and facilitating data analysis and interpretation.
Conclusions:
- A structured understanding of conceptual frameworks, as outlined by the taxonomy, is vital for robust environmental health impact assessment.
- The proposed taxonomy can improve the clarity, consistency, and informativeness of assessments.
- Enhanced understanding and application of conceptual frameworks will lead to more effective and evidence-based environmental policies.
Related Concept Videos
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Methods to Assess Microbial Communities
Types of Toxins
Air pollutants, primarily gases, pose significant threats to respiratory health, leading to conditions like hypoxia, lung cancer, and in extreme cases, death.
Environmental pollutants like...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment