General population reference values for the French version of the EuroQol EQ-5D health utility instrument
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Thomas V Perneger1, Christophe Combescure, Delphine S Courvoisier
1Division of Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. thomas.perneger@hcuge.ch
Objective:
To provide reference values for the French version of the EQ-5D and verify its capacity to discriminate between subgroups.
Methods:
General population mail survey in French-speaking Switzerland that included the EQ-5D instrument (five items rated on three levels as no problem, moderate problem, severe problem, and a visual analog health scale between 0 and 100) and descriptive variables.
Results:
Questionnaires were returned by 1956 adults (response rate 52.1%). Three of the five items had important "ceiling" effects (proportions with no problem: mobility 92.1%, self-care 97.6%, usual activities 91.2%), the other two less so (pain/discomfort 54.3%, anxiety/depression 68.1%). Four health states represented the majority of the population: no health problem (41.8%), moderate pain/discomfort only (21.0%), moderate anxiety/depression only (11.5%), moderate pain/discomfort and moderate anxiety/depression only (13.2%). The mean health utility was 0.83 (SD 0.15) on a scale between 0 and 1 and the mean visual analog score 81.7 (SD 15.5); the two were correlated (Pearson r 0.63, P < 0.001). Health utility scores were lower among women, older respondents, those with basic education, users of health services, and those with lower self-reported health status. The pattern was similar for the visual analog score except that women reported slightly higher ratings than men.
Conclusion:
The EQ-5D performed as expected in a French-speaking general population sample. Reference values by sex and age group may facilitate the interpretation of results obtained in clinical settings.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Quartile
1; 1; 2; 2; 4; 6; 6.8; 7.2; 8; 8.3; 9; 10; 10; 11.5
The median or second quartile is seven. The lower half of the...
5-Number Summary
In a box plot, the minimum and maximum data values represent the lower and upper whiskers in the graph, and the median is designated as the center of the box in the chart. The first quartile and third...
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Bioequivalence: Overview
