General surgical trainee experiences of mentoring: a UK regional audit
Usman Jaffer1, Aaron Pennell, Patrick Musonda
1Department of Vascular Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom. usman.jaffer@doctors.org.uk
Objective:
Mentoring is advocated as an essential adjunct in work-based learning providing support in career and noncareer related issues. This study aims to investigate trainee experiences and satisfaction with mentoring arrangements.
Design:
E-mail survey of surgical trainees from the East of England Higher Surgical Training Deanery, UK.
Main Outcome Measures:
Factors affecting presence of a mentoring relationship and satisfaction with mentoring arrangements were analyzed.
Results:
Of all respondents, 62.85% stated that they were not sure or did not have a mentor; 34.29% said that they had had a meaningful meeting with their mentor; 57.14% said that they were aware of the responsibilities of a mentor; 34.29% strongly agreed or agreed that mentoring had been useful; 25.71% said that mentoring had been useful in career development; and 20% found it useful in noncareer related issues. Of those with a mentor, only 31.43% were satisfied with mentoring. Factors affecting satisfaction with mentoring included having had a meaningful meeting, having clear objectives set, and help in job transition and noncareer related issues. Knowledge of a mentor's responsibilities was also associated with satisfaction. The only factor associated with the presence of a mentoring relationship was having a mentor appointed.
Conclusions:
We advocate the establishment of a mentoring matching scheme for mentors and mentees together with mentor training to improve mentoring provision for surgical trainees.
