Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond mean RTs in visual word recognition: Extensions of a remarkably stable three-way interaction amongst word frequency, stimulus degradation, and RT distributions.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

Judgments of Direction About Words and Arrows: The Neglected Influence of Task Set.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Judgments of effort and associated cues are influenced by stimulus context.

Consciousness and cognition·2025
Same author

Boredom signals deviation from a cognitive homeostatic set point.

Communications psychology·2025
Same author

Does expecting external memory support cost recognition memory?

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Correction to: On the relationship between spatial attention and semantics in the context of a Stroop paradigm.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2024
Same journal

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

An introduction to the special issue celebrating Mary A. Peterson.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Properties of the threshold stimulus exposure duration (TSED) measure of visual search efficiency.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Auditory selective attention in depth: Investigating directional dependency across front, lateral, and rear spaces.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Dissociations between stereoacuity and visual acuity with binocular night vision goggles.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Reward-based prioritization and perceptual feature effects on attentional flexibility in working memory.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Spatial attention modulates feature crosstalk in visual word processing.

Evan F Risko1, Jennifer A Stolz, Derek Besner

  • 1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. efrisko@psych.ubc.ca

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|May 4, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Spatial attention focuses processing on words, preventing feature crosstalk during reading aloud. Experiments showed focused attention protects against interference from spacing and irrelevant features.

More Related Videos

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
05:36

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
05:36

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience of Reading

Background:

  • Spatial attention is hypothesized to resolve feature-level interference during complex cognitive tasks.
  • Reading aloud involves integrating visual features and requires efficient attentional mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether spatial attention modulates feature-level crosstalk during reading aloud.
  • To examine the interaction between spatial cuing and factors known to increase feature crosstalk.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments employed a cue-validity manipulation.
  • Interletter spacing and the presence of irrelevant features were manipulated to induce feature crosstalk.
  • Participants performed reading aloud tasks under different attentional and feature-interference conditions.

Main Results:

  • A significant interaction was found between spatial cuing effects and interletter spacing.
  • The effect of spatial cuing also interacted with the presence of irrelevant features.
  • These interactions suggest spatial attention influences feature integration during reading.

Conclusions:

  • Focused spatial attention protects against feature-level crosstalk in the context of reading aloud.
  • Attentional modulation of feature interference is crucial for efficient visual processing during reading.