Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reproductive factors and mammographic density within the International Consortium of Mammographic Density: A cross-sectional study.

Breast cancer research : BCR·2024
Same author

The association of age at menarche and adult height with mammographic density in the International Consortium of Mammographic Density.

Breast cancer research : BCR·2022
Same author

Annual mammographic screening to reduce breast cancer mortality in women from age 40 years: long-term follow-up of the UK Age RCT.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2020
Same author

Mammographic Breast Density and Urbanization: Interactions with BMI, Environmental, Lifestyle, and Other Patient Factors.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same author

Could Differences in Treatment Between Trial Arms Explain the Reduction in Prostate Cancer Mortality in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer?

European urology·2019
Same author

Primary cervical screening with high risk human papillomavirus testing: observational study.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
09:19

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo

Published on: February 6, 2015

Design issues in cancer screening trials.

Sue Moss1

  • 1Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK. sue.moss@icr.ac.uk

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|May 6, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Designing effective cancer screening trials requires careful planning. Key considerations include recruitment, randomization, sample size, outcome measures, and analysis to ensure representative results.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are crucial for minimizing bias in cancer screening evaluations.
  • However, the design of these trials presents challenges that impact result interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss critical design considerations for cancer screening RCTs.
  • To highlight factors influencing the representativeness of study populations and the validity of results.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of issues related to participant recruitment and randomization processes.
  • Consideration of sample size, appropriate outcome measures, and intervention timing.
  • Examination of appropriate statistical analysis methodologies.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
09:19

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo

Published on: February 6, 2015

Main Results:

  • Recruitment and randomization strategies significantly affect population representativeness.
  • Careful selection of outcome measures and intervention timing is essential for valid conclusions.
  • Appropriate analytical approaches are vital for accurate interpretation of screening trial data.

Conclusions:

  • Thoughtful trial design, encompassing recruitment, randomization, sample size, outcome selection, and analysis, is paramount for robust cancer screening research.
  • Addressing these design elements ensures that trial findings are generalizable and reliable for informing public health policy.