Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Isolation of Cancer Stem Cells From Human Prostate Cancer Samples
Published on: March 14, 2014
Could Differences in Treatment Between Trial Arms Explain the Reduction in Prostate Cancer Mortality in the European
Sigrid V Carlsson1, Marianne Månsson2, Sue Moss3
1Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Differential treatment did not significantly impact prostate cancer (PC) mortality reduction in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Early diagnosis via prostate-specific antigen screening, not varied treatment, explains the observed PC mortality decrease.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Differential treatment allocation between arms may bias prostate cancer (PC) mortality findings in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).
- Quantifying treatment differences is crucial for accurate interpretation of PC mortality reduction in screening trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of differential treatment on observed prostate cancer mortality reduction in the ERSPC trial.
- To determine if treatment variations between the screening arm (SA) and control arm (CA) explain the mortality benefit.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 14,136 men with PC in the ERSPC core age group (55-69 years) over 16 years.
- Modeling of primary treatment allocation using multinomial logistic regression, adjusting for clinical variables.
- Comparison of observed PC deaths with estimated deaths under identical treatment scenarios in both arms.
Main Results:
- Differences in treatment distributions between arms were minimal (-3.3% to 3.3%) and smaller than observed outcome differences (7.2% to 10.1%).
- Estimated PC mortality differences due to treatment variations were trivial (0.05% and -0.01%) when applying models across arms.
- Differential treatment explained only a minor proportion of the overall 4.2% PC mortality reduction observed in the ERSPC trial.
Conclusions:
- The reduction in prostate cancer mortality in the ERSPC trial is primarily attributed to earlier diagnosis through prostate-specific antigen screening.
- Differential treatment between the screening and control arms did not significantly contribute to the observed mortality benefit.
- Findings underscore the importance of screening in reducing prostate cancer mortality, independent of treatment variations.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
Cancer
What is Cancer?
Although people have known about cancer for centuries, it was only in 1761 that Giovanni Morgagni of Padua performed a detailed autopsy of...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

