Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition
Published on: February 8, 2018
Pinning down response inhibition in the brain--conjunction analyses of the Stop-signal task
C N Boehler1, L G Appelbaum, R M Krebs
1Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA. nico.boehler@duke.edu
Abstract:
Successful behavior requires a finely-tuned interplay of initiating and inhibiting motor programs to react effectively to constantly changing environmental demands. One particularly useful paradigm for investigating inhibitory motor control is the Stop-signal task, where already-initiated responses to Go-stimuli are to be inhibited upon the rapid subsequent presentation of a Stop-stimulus (yielding successful and unsuccessful Stop-trials). Despite the extensive use of this paradigm in functional neuroimaging, there is no consensus on which functional comparison to use to characterize response-inhibition-related brain activity. Here, we utilize conjunction analyses of successful and unsuccessful Stop-trials that are each contrasted against a reference condition. This conjunction approach identifies processes common to both Stop-trial types while excluding processes specific to either, thereby capitalizing on the presence of some response-inhibition-related activity in both conditions. Using this approach on fMRI data from human subjects, we identify a network of brain structures that was linked to both types of Stop-trials, including lateral-inferior frontal and medial frontal cortical areas and the caudate nucleus. In addition, comparisons with a reference condition matched for visual stimulation identified additional activity in the right inferior parietal cortex that may play a role in enhancing the processing of the Stop-stimuli. Finally, differences in stopping efficacy across subjects were associated with variations in activity in the left anterior insula. However, this region was also associated with general task accuracy (which furthermore correlated directly with stopping efficacy), suggesting that it might actually reflect a more general mechanism of performance control that supports response inhibition in a relatively nonspecific way.
Insights
Researchers identified brain networks involved in stopping actions using a novel fMRI analysis. This approach clarifies neural mechanisms of inhibitory motor control and performance monitoring during the Stop-signal task.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Neuroimaging
Background:
- Successful behavior relies on balancing action initiation and inhibition for environmental adaptation.
- The Stop-signal task is crucial for studying inhibitory motor control, involving response inhibition to stop-stimuli.
- Current functional neuroimaging lacks consensus on analyzing response inhibition in the Stop-signal task.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a robust functional comparison for characterizing response-inhibition-related brain activity in the Stop-signal task.
- To identify neural networks common to both successful and unsuccessful response inhibition using conjunction analyses.
- To investigate the neural correlates of stopping efficacy and general performance control.
Main Methods:
- Utilized functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) on human subjects performing the Stop-signal task.
- Employed conjunction analyses, contrasting successful and unsuccessful Stop-trials against a matched reference condition.
- Analyzed brain activity to identify common and distinct neural processes related to response inhibition.
Main Results:
- Identified a core network for response inhibition including lateral-inferior frontal, medial frontal cortical areas, and the caudate nucleus.
- Found activity in the right inferior parietal cortex potentially involved in enhancing stop-stimulus processing.
- Observed that individual differences in stopping efficacy correlated with activity in the left anterior insula, also linked to general task accuracy.
Conclusions:
- The conjunction analysis approach effectively identifies neural processes common to both successful and unsuccessful response inhibition.
- The identified fronto-striatal network is critical for inhibitory motor control.
- The left anterior insula may support performance control more generally, rather than solely specific response inhibition.

