Related Experiment Videos
The application of sameness analysis to spelling
1Washington Research Institute, Seattle.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
|May 1, 1991
Summary
This study examines three spelling instruction methods: whole word, phonemic, and morphemic. While all show theoretical potential for generalization in students with learning disabilities, weak evidence suggests piloting new programs before adoption.
Area of Science:
- Educational Psychology
- Special Education
- Linguistics
Background:
- Effective spelling instruction is crucial for academic success.
- Students with learning disabilities often struggle with spelling generalization.
- Existing curricular approaches include whole word, phonemic, and morphemic strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To theoretically analyze the potential of whole word, phonemic, and morphemic spelling instruction approaches.
- To evaluate how these approaches facilitate generalization, retention, and transfer of spelling skills.
- To provide recommendations for selecting and evaluating spelling programs for students with learning disabilities.
Main Methods:
- Sameness analysis was employed to assess the theoretical efficacy of each spelling approach.
- The study discusses the influence of generalization on spelling retention and transfer.
- A review of empirical evidence supporting current approaches was conducted.
Main Results:
- All three approaches (whole word, phonemic, morphemic) theoretically offer potential for spelling generalization.
- Empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of these approaches is currently weak.
- Generalization is a key factor influencing long-term retention and transfer of spelling knowledge.
Conclusions:
- Given the limited empirical support, piloting new spelling instructional programs is recommended before widespread adoption.
- Analytical evaluation of spelling programs is advised for educators considering new interventions.
- Further research is needed to strengthen the evidence base for various spelling instruction methods.