Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random Error01:04

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Menopausal Hormone Labels Should Rely on Evidence, Not Opinion.

JAMA·2026
Same author

Subgroups and Special Populations in Heart Failure Clinical Trials: Insights From the HFC-ARC Expert Consensus Panel.

JACC. Heart failure·2026
Same author

Efficacy and Safety of Baxdrostat in Uncontrolled and Resistant Hypertension.

The New England journal of medicine·2025
Same author

Monitoring overall survival in pivotal trials in indolent cancers.

Statistics in biopharmaceutical research·2025
Same author

Response to Cleland and Anzar.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2025
Same author

Aspirin in primary prevention: Undue reliance on an uninformative trial led to misinformed clinical guidelines.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2025
Same journal

A statistical evaluation of decision-making methods and the efficiency of Bayesian multi-arm multi-stage trials.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Accounting for non-adherence: A re-analysis of the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results trial.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Phase I design for partially ordered groups with late-onset toxicity.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Trial informed consent forms, the Declaration of Helsinki and the SPIRIT 2025 statement.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

17th Annual University of Pennsylvania Conference on statistical issues in clinical trials - Covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials: New methods and applications (Morning panel discussion).

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

17th Annual University of Pennsylvania Conference on statistical issues in clinical trials - Covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials: New methods and applications (Afternoon panel discussion).

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Some practical problems in implementing randomization.

Matt Downs1, Kathryn Tucker, Heidi Christ-Schmidt

  • 1Statistics Collaborative Inc., Washington DC, USA. matt@statcollab.com

Clinical Trials (London, England)
|May 21, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Ensuring treatment allocation integrity in clinical trials is crucial. This study offers practical recommendations to prevent and mitigate errors in randomization processes, enhancing trial reliability.

More Related Videos

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
06:54

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Published on: June 21, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
06:54

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Published on: June 21, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Pharmaceutical Research

Background:

  • Implementing masked treatment randomization in clinical trials presents practical challenges despite theoretical simplicity.
  • Errors in randomization can arise from design, programming, or human error during trial conduct.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address practical issues in randomization implementation, focusing on design, programming, and human errors.
  • To provide actionable recommendations for minimizing and managing randomization errors in clinical trials.

Main Methods:

  • Case studies illustrating common randomization pitfalls.
  • Development of practical recommendations based on industry experience.

Main Results:

  • Recommendations include rigorous schedule review, cautious use of on-demand random number generators, and clear specifications.
  • Emphasis on thorough system testing, maintaining auditable randomization data, and preventing inadvertent unmasking.
  • Suggestions for error correction policies and verification of drug packaging and labeling.

Conclusions:

  • Verifying the integrity of treatment allocation is essential before and during clinical trials.
  • Recommendations are primarily based on industry experience, highlighting the need for broader data on error prevalence.