Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

08:05
A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
BOLD Responses to Negative Reward Prediction Errors in Human Habenula
Ramiro Salas1, Philip Baldwin, Mariella de Biasi
1Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza Houston, TX, USA.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
|May 21, 2010
Summary
Researchers identified negative reward prediction errors in the human habenula using fMRI. This finding advances our understanding of learning and decision-making processes in the brain.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Science
- Neuroimaging
Background:
- Positive reward prediction error is well-studied in dopamine cells, but negative reward prediction errors in humans are less understood.
- Animal studies indicate the habenula encodes negative reward events, including negative reward prediction errors.
- The small size of the human habenula has historically limited direct functional studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a method for functionally locating and studying the human habenula using fMRI.
- To provide conclusive evidence for human habenula activation in response to negative reward prediction errors.
Main Methods:
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was employed to study brain activity.
- A novel method was developed to functionally identify the habenula in humans.
- The study leveraged the known reward-dependent response patterns of the habenula and striatum.
Main Results:
- Conclusive evidence of activation in the human habenula was found.
- This activation specifically correlated with negative reward prediction errors.
- The developed fMRI method successfully allowed for the study of the human habenula.
Conclusions:
- The human habenula is demonstrably activated by negative reward prediction errors.
- This research opens new avenues for studying learning and decision-making deficits.
- The fMRI technique provides a viable tool for future human habenula research.
Related Concept Videos
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role of...
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness
Avoidance learning and learned helplessness are critical concepts in understanding behavioral responses to negative stimuli.
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Hindsight Biases
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Punishment
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Reinforcement
Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:

