Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inequalities01:28

Inequalities

Inequalities express mathematical relationships where two values are not equal and are compared using symbols such as <, >, ≤, or ≥. These expressions define a range of possible solutions rather than a single value. Interval notation provides a concise way to express these solution sets, especially when the variable spans a continuous range. An open interval, written as (a, b), excludes the endpoints, while a closed interval [a, b] includes them. There are also half-open intervals, such...
Graphical Representation of Inequalities01:28

Graphical Representation of Inequalities

The graph of the equation where y equals x squared forms a curve known as a parabola. This curve acts as a boundary in the coordinate plane, dividing it into distinct regions based on the relative position of points.When the equality sign in the equation is replaced with an inequality—such as greater than, less than, greater than or equal to, or less than or equal to—the graphical representation changes from a single curve into a broader shaded area that signifies the set of all points...
Solving Inequalities Graphically01:24

Solving Inequalities Graphically

Solving inequalities graphically involves using a visual approach to determine where a mathematical expression meets a specific condition, such as being greater than or less than another value. By examining the position of a graph relative to the x-axis or another graph, it becomes possible to identify the range of x-values that satisfy the inequality. This method provides an intuitive understanding of solution intervals by showing where the inequality holds true.Graphical solutions to...
Application of Nonlinear Inequalities01:29

Application of Nonlinear Inequalities

A nonlinear inequality describes a comparison involving an expression that curves or behaves more complexly than a straight line. These inequalities often appear in forms that include squares, products, or variables in the denominator.To solve such an inequality, one starts by rewriting it so that zero appears on one side. For example, the inequality:  can be factored as: This form makes it easier to identify the values that cause the expression to equal zero. In this case, the key values are 3...
Introduction to the Sign Test01:10

Introduction to the Sign Test

The sign test is an important tool in nonparametric statistics, offering a straightforward yet effective method for analyzing matched pairs, nominal data, or hypotheses concerning the median of a population. It transforms data points into positive or negative signs, avoiding the need for assumptions about data distribution and instead focusing on the direction of change. It is particularly valuable when data does not conform to the normal distribution requirements of many parametric tests. For...
Introduction to Nonlinear Inequalities01:25

Introduction to Nonlinear Inequalities

Linear and nonlinear inequalities are fundamental for analyzing variable relationships and identifying ranges satisfying specific conditions. A linear inequality involves variables raised only to the first power, resulting in a straight-line graph. This line partitions the coordinate plane into two distinct regions: one that satisfies the inequality and one that does not. Each region represents a set of solutions where the linear relationship holds true under the specified constraint.Nonlinear...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A bird's-eye view of research practices in mathematical cognition, learning, and instruction: Reimagining the status quo.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2024
Same author

Is zero more than nothing? Relations between concepts of zero and integer understanding.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2024
Same author

How teachers make connections among ideas in mathematics instruction.

Advances in child development and behavior·2024
Same author

Deterministic or probabilistic: U.S. children's beliefs about genetic inheritance.

Child development·2024
Same author

Some Correct Strategies Are Better Than Others: Individual Differences in Strategy Evaluations Are Related to Strategy Adoption.

Cognitive science·2023
Same author

Relations between patterning skill and differing aspects of early mathematics knowledge.

Cognitive development·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Learning about the equal sign: does comparing with inequality symbols help?

Shanta Hattikudur1, Martha W Alibali

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA. hattikudur@wisc.edu

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
|May 22, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Comparing symbols alongside the equal sign significantly improves third and fourth graders' mathematical understanding. This comparative approach enhances conceptual knowledge more effectively than focusing on the equal sign alone.

More Related Videos

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
14:43

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish

Published on: July 18, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
14:43

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish

Published on: July 18, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Mathematics Education
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Students often misinterpret the equal sign as an operational cue rather than a symbol of equivalence.
  • Traditional instruction may not adequately address the relational nature of the equal sign.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of comparative symbol instruction versus equal sign-only instruction.
  • To determine if teaching the equal sign alongside inequality symbols enhances conceptual understanding.

Main Methods:

  • Third and fourth graders were divided into three groups: comparative symbols, equal sign only, and control.
  • Pre- and post-assessments measured conceptual understanding, equation encoding, and problem-solving skills.
  • The comparative symbols group learned about greater than, less than, and equal signs.

Main Results:

  • Students in the comparative symbols group demonstrated superior gains in conceptual understanding of the equal sign.
  • This group also outperformed others on assessments of inequality symbols and problem-solving.
  • Comparative instruction proved effective within the same instructional time.

Conclusions:

  • Instruction involving comparison of relational symbols is more effective for learning the equal sign.
  • Comparative approaches can be a powerful tool for teaching mathematical concepts.
  • This method efficiently imparts knowledge of multiple mathematical symbols.