[Study of the arrhythmogenicity of cardiomyopathies. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathies]

Forty-four cases of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (23 men, 21 women; 55 +/- 15 years) referred for evaluation of chest pain (28 cases), dyspnoea (26 cases), palpitations (25 cases), dizziness (11 cases) and syncope (4 cases), were investigated prospectively between February 1983 and February 1989. The cardiomyopathy was concentric (N = 16), obstructive (N = 24) or apical (N = 4) and the diagnosis confirmed by angiography. Twenty-four hour Holter monitoring showed no ventricular extrasystoles in 43% of patients: the others had Grade I (25%), Grade III (2%), Grade 4A (14%) or 4B (16%) ventricular arrhythmias with diurnal predominance in half the cases. Patients with greater than or equal to Grade III ventricular extrasystoles had greater left axis deviation but did not differ from the others from the hemodynamic point of view. Exercise stress testing induced an isolated ventricular arrhythmia in 23% of patients and repetitive extrasystoles in 23%. The prevalence of surface late ventricular potentials was no greater in these patients than in normal subjects (4% vs 1%; NS). Programmed ventricular stimulation (N = 37) induced a repetitive response in only 25% of patients, with only two cases of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. There were no correlations between the results of programmed ventricular stimulation and those of Holter monitoring, exercise stress testing or late ventricular potential recording, but patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation had proportionally more syncopal episodes and greater than or equal to Grade III ventricular extrasystoles on Holter monitoring, but the difference was not statistically significant in this series.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)