Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Serial Position Effect01:03

Serial Position Effect

The serial position effect is a cognitive phenomenon where individuals are more likely to recall the first and last items in a list compared to those in the middle. This effect is divided into the primacy effect and the recency effect. The primacy effect is observed when the initial items in a list are remembered better. This occurs because these items are rehearsed more frequently or receive more elaborative processing, allowing them to be encoded into long-term memory more effectively. For...
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cognitive Functioning and the Quality of Survey Responses: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of 10 Epidemiological Studies of Aging.

The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences·2024
Same author

Attrition from longitudinal ageing studies and performance across domains of cognitive functioning: an individual participant data meta-analysis.

BMJ open·2024
Same author

Neighborhood Social Environment and Self-Perceptions of Aging.

Innovation in aging·2023
Same author

Using Item Response Times in Online Questionnaires to Detect Mild Cognitive Impairment.

The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences·2023
Same author

Quality of Survey Responses at Older Ages Predicts Cognitive Decline and Mortality Risk.

Innovation in aging·2022
Same author

Subtle mistakes in self-report surveys predict future transition to dementia.

Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

List and text recall differ in their predictors: replication over samples and time.

Kayan L Lewis1, Elizabeth M Zelinski

  • 1Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0191, USA.

The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
|May 26, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study reveals that list recall and text recall involve distinct cognitive processes. Working memory impacts both, while processing speed uniquely affects list recall, differentiating memory recall types.

More Related Videos

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
06:35

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
06:35

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • Understanding the distinct cognitive processes underlying different types of memory recall is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Previous research has explored factors influencing memory recall, but the specific distinctions between list and text recall require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the hypothesis that latent list and text recall involve distinct cognitive processes.
  • To examine the predictive roles of age, processing speed, working memory, and vocabulary on list and text recall.

Main Methods:

  • A bivariate outcome path model was employed to analyze latent list and text recall.
  • Data from the Long Beach Longitudinal Study (1994) and an additional panel were used to assess model generalizability and invariance across different samples and attrition groups.

Main Results:

  • Working memory reliably predicted both list and text recall, independent of age.
  • Processing speed reliably predicted only list recall.
  • The influence of vocabulary on recall was mediated by age, working memory, and processing speed.
  • The proposed model demonstrated invariance across all tested groups, confirming its generalizability.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support a replicable distinction between latent list and text recall, suggesting different underlying cognitive mechanisms.
  • This research provides a robust model for understanding memory recall, applicable across diverse populations and longitudinal data.
  • The results highlight the differential contributions of working memory and processing speed to various memory recall tasks.