Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ionic versus nonionic contrast use.

H O Stolberg1, B L McClennan

  • 1McMaster University Medical School, Hamilton General Hospital, Ontario, Canada.

Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
|March 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond the glitz of new equipment.

Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes·2001
Same author

Urography survives.

Radiology·2001
Same author

Collaboration between sonologists and sonographers in ultrasonography.

Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes·2000
Same author

Standards and guidelines of the CAR on CD-ROM.

Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes·2000
Same author

Dying of ignorance.

The Hastings Center report·2000
Same author

What today's department says about the future.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2000
Same journal

Program signaling in the integrated interventional radiology residency match: A cross-sectional survey of program directors.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2026
Same journal

ACR BI-RADS<sup>Ⓡ</sup> v2025: A summary of changes.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2026
Same journal

Predominantly middle authors in radiology: a bibliometric assessment.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2026
Same journal

Radiology's carbon footprint: Why environmental harm remains outside clinical responsibility.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2026
Same journal

The imaging dilemma of solid serous cystadenomas, PNETs, and vascular pancreatic metastases: Challenges and diagnostic strategies.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2026
Same journal

Awareness, discussion, and understanding of interventional radiology Procedures among non-interventional radiology medical providers on X: A social media infodemiology study.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2026
See all related articles

Intravascular contrast media, developed over years, are classified into four types. Nonionic agents offer advantages over ionic agents due to differing toxicological properties, impacting diagnostic radiology.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Intravascular contrast media are crucial for diagnostic radiology, developed through extensive research.
  • These agents are iodinated compounds characterized by water solubility and chemical structure.
  • Current agents fall into four categories: ionic monomers, ionic monoacid dimers, nonionic monomers, and nonionic dimers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the history, development, and properties of intravascular contrast media.
  • To analyze the organ-specific toxic effects and adverse events associated with different contrast agent types.
  • To discuss the clinical application and advantages of nonionic contrast agents in various radiological procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Review of scientific literature on intravascular contrast media.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of chemical structure, toxicity, and water-solubility relationships.
  • Evaluation of organ-specific toxic effects (CNS, cardiovascular, renal) and clinical manifestations.

    • Main Results:

    • Four distinct chemical classifications of intravascular contrast media exist.
    • Physicochemical differences among agents significantly impact osmotoxicity, chemotoxicity, and ion toxicity.
    • Nonionic agents exhibit different toxicological and pharmacological profiles compared to ionic agents.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of contrast media is critical, with nonionic agents offering distinct advantages.
    • Understanding agent properties is essential for minimizing risks and optimizing use in diagnostic radiology.
    • Economic and ethical considerations guide strategies for safe and rational contrast media utilization.