A pharmacodynamic study of rapamycin in men with intermediate- to high-risk localized prostate cancer

Andrew J Armstrong1, George J Netto, Michelle A Rudek

  • 1Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center and Duke Prostate Center, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. andrew.armstrong@duke.edu

Abstract

Insights

Rapamycin at 3 mg daily safely inhibited S6 phosphorylation in prostate cancer tumors. This mTOR inhibitor achieved high prostate tissue concentrations without affecting tumor proliferation or apoptosis.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Discrepancies exist between preclinical and clinical findings regarding mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition in prostate cancer.
  • Understanding the pharmacodynamic effects of mTOR inhibitors is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the pharmacodynamic effects of the mTOR/TORC1 inhibitor rapamycin in men with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer.
  • To evaluate the inhibition of S6 phosphorylation as a primary pharmacodynamic outcome.

Main Methods:

  • Rapamycin was administered orally at 3 mg or 6 mg for 14 days prior to radical prostatectomy.
  • A Simon two-stage design was used to assess pharmacodynamic efficacy based on S6 phosphorylation inhibition.
  • Tumor tissue from biopsies and post-treatment radical prostatectomy specimens were compared.

Main Results:

  • Rapamycin at 3 mg daily demonstrated significant inhibition of tumor S6 phosphorylation (median 58% inhibition, P = 0.049) compared to controls.
  • The 3 mg dose was safe, with adverse events including stomatitis and rash; however, the 6 mg dose showed dose-limiting toxicities.
  • No significant impact on AKT phosphorylation, tumor proliferation (Ki-67), or apoptosis (caspase-3 cleavage) was observed.

Conclusions:

  • A daily dose of 3 mg rapamycin effectively and safely inhibited S6 phosphorylation in prostate cancer.
  • The drug achieved substantial concentrations within prostate tissue.
  • Rapamycin treatment did not influence tumor proliferation or apoptosis markers in this study.

Related Concept Videos

mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression03:03

mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression

The mammalian target of rapamycin or mTOR protein was discovered in 1994 due to its direct interaction with rapamycin. The protein gets its name from a yeast homolog called TOR. The mTOR protein complex in mammalian cells plays a major role in balancing anabolic processes such as the synthesis of proteins, lipids, and nucleotides and catabolic processes, such as autophagy in response to environmental cues, such as availability of nutrients and growth factors.
The mTOR pathway or the...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression03:03

mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression

The mammalian target of rapamycin or mTOR protein was discovered in 1994 due to its direct interaction with rapamycin. The protein gets its name from a yeast homolog called TOR. The mTOR protein complex in mammalian cells plays a major role in balancing anabolic processes such as the synthesis of proteins, lipids, and nucleotides and catabolic processes, such as autophagy in response to environmental cues, such as availability of nutrients and growth factors.
The mTOR pathway or the...
PI3K/mTOR/AKT Signaling Pathway01:22

PI3K/mTOR/AKT Signaling Pathway

The mammalian target of rapamycin  (mTOR) is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates growth, proliferation, and cell survival in response to hormones, growth factors, or nutrient availability. This kinase exists in two structurally and functionally distinct forms: mTOR complex 1  (mTORC1) and mTOR complex 2  (mTORC2). The first form (mTORC1) is composed of a rapamycin-sensitive Raptor and proline-rich Akt substrate, PRAS40. In contrast,  mTORC2 consists of a rapamycin-insensitive companion...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF).
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems01:24

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems

The empirical approach to drug therapy optimization relies on correlating pharmacological response with administered dosage. Such an approach can be costly, time-consuming, and often yields poor correlation due to variables like formulation factors and drug elimination characteristics. A more precise approach correlates response with plasma drug concentration or the amount of drug in the body, rather than dosage. This is achieved through pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling, which...