Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

06:13
Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018
Hydrodissection for subperichondrial septoplasty - an experimental anatomical study
P Dubach1, G Mantokoudis, Y Banz
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland. patrick.dubach@insel.ch
Rhinology
|May 27, 2010
Summary
Hydrostatic infiltrations for subperichondrial dissection are unreliable, often dissecting incorrect tissue planes. While useful for anesthesia and hemostasis, high-volume injections risk serious complications.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Surgical Anatomy
- Histology
Background:
- The efficacy of hydrostatic infiltrations for subperichondrial dissection is debated, with some sources citing it as crucial and others deeming it impractical.
- Case reports have documented severe adverse events associated with this technique, yet experimental data is lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To experimentally evaluate the reliability and accuracy of hydrostatic infiltrations for achieving subperichondrial dissection.
- To analyze the histological outcomes of simulated hydrodissection, including dissection plane accuracy, and potential complications.
Main Methods:
- An experimental study involving three surgeons performing simulated subperichondrial hydrodissection on 20 human cadaver heads.
- Infiltration of 1 ml of lidocaine 5% with adrenaline and India ink, followed by histological examination of serial sections to analyze dissection planes, ink deposition, and intravasal spread.
Main Results:
- All injections resulted in physical dissection, but the planes were predominantly supra-perichondrial (n=8) or within the perichondrium (n=4), with only five achieving the desired subperichondrial plane.
- Infiltrated material spread beyond the dissection site, accumulating in surrounding vessels (n=8).
- Three anomalous septa were excluded from quantitative analysis.
Conclusions:
- Hydrostatic infiltrations are an unreliable method for accurate subperichondrial dissection.
- The technique may offer benefits for anesthesia and hemostasis, but high-pressure, high-volume injections carry risks of significant complications.
