Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Spatially selective fluorescent microscope based on electrically tunable liquid crystal lenses.

Applied optics·2026

Same author

Speculum-free portable preterm imaging system.

Journal of biomedical optics·2024

Same author

Snapshot imaging Mueller matrix polarimeter using modified Savart polariscopes.

Applied optics·2023

Same author

High Refractive Index Copolymers with Improved Thermomechanical Properties via the Inverse Vulcanization of Sulfur and 1,3,5-Triisopropenylbenzene.

ACS macro letters·2022

Same author

Chalcogenide Hybrid Inorganic/Organic Polymers: Ultrahigh Refractive Index Polymers for Infrared Imaging.

ACS macro letters·2022

Same author

Performance analysis of a compact auto-phoropter for accessible refractive assessment of the human eye.

Applied optics·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

$Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter$

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Problems testing diffractive intraocular lenses with Shack-Hartmann sensors.

Jim Schwiegerling¹, Edward DeHoog

¹Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Arizona, 655 North Alvernon Way, Suite 108, Tucson, Arizona 85711, USA. jschwieg@u.arizona.edu

|June 3, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors may inaccurately measure patients with diffractive intraocular lenses. This study explores the limitations of this technology for such patients, highlighting potential measurement errors.

More Related Videos

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler (SLPS) Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler (SLPS) Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Published on: June 6, 2017

Second Harmonic Generation Signals in Rabbit Sclera As a Tool for Evaluation of Therapeutic Tissue Cross-linking (TXL) for Myopia

Second Harmonic Generation Signals in Rabbit Sclera As a Tool for Evaluation of Therapeutic Tissue Cross-linking (TXL) for Myopia

Published on: January 6, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

$Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter$

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler (SLPS) Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler (SLPS) Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Published on: June 6, 2017

Second Harmonic Generation Signals in Rabbit Sclera As a Tool for Evaluation of Therapeutic Tissue Cross-linking (TXL) for Myopia

Second Harmonic Generation Signals in Rabbit Sclera As a Tool for Evaluation of Therapeutic Tissue Cross-linking (TXL) for Myopia

Published on: January 6, 2018

Area of Science:

Ophthalmology
Optical Engineering
Biomedical Optics

Background:

Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors are standard for measuring ocular aberrations.
These sensors accurately map the eye's wavefront in most clinical cases.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the potential inaccuracies of Shack-Hartmann sensors when measuring patients with diffractive intraocular lenses.
To identify and explore the specific challenges and pitfalls associated with this technology in this patient group.

Main Methods:

The study involves analyzing the performance of Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing technology.
Focus is placed on theoretical considerations and potential measurement discrepancies with diffractive optics.

Main Results:

Shack-Hartmann devices may yield incorrect measurements for patients with diffractive intraocular lenses.
The presence of diffractive optics introduces complexities not adequately addressed by current sensor technology.

Conclusions:

The widespread use of Shack-Hartmann sensors may lead to mischaracterization of visual function in patients with diffractive intraocular lenses.
Further research and sensor development are needed to accurately assess ocular aberrations in patients with advanced intraocular lens technologies.