Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Quantitative Assessment Protocol for Facial Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes with Stereophotogrammetry
Published on: December 9, 2025
[Facial volumes and vertical facial type: a three dimensional comparative study]
Nayla Bassil-Nassif1, Joseph Bouserhal, Robert Garcia
1Département d'Orthodontie, Faculté de Médecine Dentaire, Université Saint-Joseph, rue de Damas, B.P. 11-5076 Riad El Solh, Beyrouth, Liban. nbassilnassif@yahoo.com
Facial cavity volumes are similar in long- and short-faced individuals. However, the nasal cavity volume ratio is smaller in short-faced subjects, suggesting compensatory growth.
Area of Science:
- Craniofacial anatomy
- Anthropometry
- Biometrics
Background:
- Facial morphology varies significantly among individuals.
- Understanding variations in facial cavity volumes is crucial for diagnosing and treating craniofacial abnormalities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the volumes of orbital, sinusal, and buccal cavities in young adults with long and short faces.
- To investigate potential differences in facial cavity volumes based on mandibular plane angles.
Main Methods:
- Selected two groups of 30 young adults (18-30 years) with low (GoGn-SN ≤ 28°) and high (GoGn-SN ≥ 36°) mandibular plane angles.
- Measured orbital, sinusal, and buccal cavity volumes using CT scans and AMIRA software.
- Performed statistical analysis with Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Student's t-tests (p < 0.05).
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences were found in the total volumes of facial cavities between long- and short-faced subjects.
- The ratio of nasal cavity volume to total facial cavity volume was significantly smaller in the short-face group.
Conclusions:
- A compensatory growth phenomenon may exist to maintain constant facial cavity volumes despite variations in vertical growth.
- These findings suggest that facial structure adaptations occur to balance vertical growth dimensions.
More Related Videos
10:23Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: September 8, 2023
08:03Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Muscles for Facial Expressions
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Finding Volume Using Cross-Sectional Area