Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Skin Cancer - Perineural Tumor Spread.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2026
Same author

HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma - Key Updates to the AJCC/UICC TNM9 Staging System.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Does Obesity Predispose Patients to Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence?

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2025
Same author

Imaging of the Cervical Lymph Nodes: Anatomy and Pathology.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America·2025
Same author

Derivation and validation of the AJCC9V pathological stage classification for HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre registry analysis.

The Lancet. Oncology·2025
Same author

In Reply: The Sagittal Angle of the Trigeminal Nerve at the Porus Trigeminus is a Radiologic Predictor of Surgical Outcome in Microvascular Decompression for Classical Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Neurosurgery·2025
Same journal

Comment on "Validation of a Single-Item Screener for Financial Toxicity in Outpatient Imaging Patients".

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

Comparison of supplemental breast cancer screening outcomes for automated versus hand-held ultrasound.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

Screening Mammography Completion Among Women Enrolled in a Lung Cancer Screening Program.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

Hantavirus Infection Beyond the Lung: A Multi-Organ Radiological Perspective on Diagnosis, Imaging Modalities, and Precautionary Measures for Radiology Departments.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Myelopathy: 2026 Update.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same journal

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Knee Pain: Update 2026.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Optimizing radiology peer review: a mathematical model for selecting future cases based on prior errors.

Yun Robert Sheu1, Elie Feder, Igor Balsim

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
|June 5, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a mathematical model to optimize radiologist peer review by prioritizing cases with higher error probability, morbidity, and cost. This approach enhances efficiency and provides more meaningful feedback for quality improvement in patient care.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Informatics
  • Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Physician peer review is crucial for patient care and learning.
  • Radiologists often find peer review time-consuming, subjective, and lacking clear impact.
  • Advances like RADPEER aim to standardize and integrate peer review.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a mathematical model for optimizing case selection in radiologist peer review.
  • To enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of peer review processes.

Main Methods:

  • Analyzed 612,890 radiology reports (1999-2004) from a tertiary care center.
  • Classified discrepancies by severity and validated major discrepancies.
  • Developed a mathematical model to calculate combined morbidity and financial costs of errors across modalities and divisions.

Main Results:

  • Generated customized reports for radiologists, identifying high-cost review categories.
  • Compiled universal total cost data based on probability across all radiologists.

Conclusions:

  • Mathematical models can optimize radiologist peer review efficiency and effectiveness.
  • This approach provides more concrete and meaningful feedback for continuous improvement.