Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Horney's Sociocultural Approach

Horney's Sociocultural Approach

Karen Horney's psychoanalytic theories emphasize the potential for self-realization and the importance of addressing social and cultural, rather than biological, factors in personality development. She challenged traditional Freudian views, particularly Freud's concept of "penis envy," which she argued stemmed from cultural influences rather than inherent biological differences. Horney believed that any sense of inferiority in women was a result of societal conditioning, such as dependence on...

Evolutionary Psychology

Evolutionary Psychology

Evolutionary psychology explores the origins of human behavior and mental processes by framing them within the context of natural selection, a theory famously propounded by Charles Darwin. This field asserts that many behaviors common across human societies — ranging from instinctive fear reactions to complex social interactions — arose as evolutionary adaptations. These adaptations enhanced the survival and reproductive success of our ancestors, thereby becoming embedded in the human psyche...

Humanistic Psychology

Humanistic Psychology

Humanistic psychology emerged in the mid-20th century as a response to the deterministic and pessimistic nature of behaviorism and psychoanalysis. While behaviorism focused on observable behaviors influenced by the environment and psychoanalysis delved into unconscious motivations, both theories suggested that human actions lacked free will. In contrast, humanistic psychology offers a perspective that emphasizes the innate potential for goodness and growth within every individual.
This approach...

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...

Relationship Formation

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...

Cultural Influences on Personality

Cultural Influences on Personality

Individualist and collectivist cultures emphasize different core values, shaping personality in distinct ways. In individualist cultures, such as those in the United States, England, and Australia, people prioritize independence, competition, and personal achievement. These societies tend to promote self-focused traits, with individuals often reporting higher levels of self-esteem. In contrast, collectivist cultures, commonly found in regions like Asia, Africa, and South America, emphasize...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Mythos in the light of evolution.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Published on: February 25, 2011

WEIRD societies may be more compatible with human nature.

Alexandra Maryanski¹

¹Department of Sociology, University of California-Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA. alexandra.maryanski@ucr.edu

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences

|June 16, 2010

Summary

Most societies studied are WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic), but this research suggests they may actually be more representative of human nature than traditional societies. This challenges conventional thinking in behavioral sciences.

More Related Videos

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes

Published on: December 15, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Published on: February 25, 2011

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes

Published on: December 15, 2023

Area of Science:

Behavioral Sciences
Anthropology
Evolutionary Psychology

Background:

The dominant research paradigm in behavioral sciences relies heavily on participants from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies.
Critics argue that WEIRD populations are statistically unrepresentative of humanity, residing at the extreme end of societal distributions.
This perspective suggests that traditional societies offer a more accurate baseline for understanding human nature.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically evaluate the representativeness of WEIRD societies in generalizing human nature.
To propose an alternative perspective on the compatibility of WEIRD populations with evolved human characteristics.
To challenge the prevailing notion that traditional societies are the sole reliable source for understanding human universals.

Main Methods:

This study is a theoretical commentary, analyzing existing arguments and proposing a new framework.
It involves a critical review of anthropological and psychological literature concerning societal structures and human behavior.
The commentary synthesizes evolutionary theory with observations on WEIRD and traditional societies.

Main Results:

WEIRD societies may not be as unrepresentative as commonly argued.
Contrary to prevailing views, WEIRD populations might exhibit characteristics more aligned with humans' evolved nature.
Traditional societies may present greater deviations from evolved human predispositions than WEIRD societies.

Conclusions:

The assumption that WEIRD societies are inherently unrepresentative requires re-examination.
A more nuanced understanding suggests WEIRD populations could offer valuable insights into human nature.
Future research should consider the unique psychological and behavioral profiles of WEIRD populations in the context of human evolution.