Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.

What is an Experiment?

What is an Experiment?

An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...

Unusual Results

Unusual Results

Unusual results are those that have a very low chance of occurring. Unusual results can be identified using probabilities and the range rule of thumb. In problems involving probability, unusual results can be observed in 2 instances – an unusually high number of successes or an unusually low number of successes.
According to the range rule of thumb, any value above or below two standard deviations, 2σ from the mean, μ is considered unusual.
Maximum unusual value = μ + 2σ
Minimum unusual value...

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

Naturalistic Observations

Naturalistic Observations

If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...

Extrasensory Perception

Extrasensory Perception

Extrasensory perception, or ESP, suggests the ability to perceive events beyond the conventional senses of sight, hearing, and touch. Parapsychologists, who research ESP and related psychic phenomena, categorize ESP into three main types: precognition, telepathy, and clairvoyance.
Precognition involves foreseeing future events, such as predicting an accident before it happens. An example of precognition could be someone dreaming about a specific event, like a car crash, which then occurs...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Perceived Waist-to-Hip Ratio Predicts Attractiveness, Age, and Parity Judgments in Pre-Contemporary European Portraits of Clothed Women.

Archives of sexual behavior·2026

Same author

Moral cognition is contractualist, but does not work by simulating a bargaining process.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same author

Distinguishing regulatory variables and ecological affordances: Prioritizing goals versus implementing action.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same author

Openness to Experience: from ecology to culture.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same author

'Our Roots Run Deep': Historical Myths as Culturally Evolved Technologies for Coalitional Recruitment - CORRIGENDUM.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025

Same author

Quantifying and explaining the rise of fiction.

Evolutionary human sciences·2025

Same journal

Shared intentionality and attachment theories in WILD and WEIRD contexts.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same journal

Constructing an architecture for a decolonized developmental science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same journal

Go WILD, but mind the gap.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same journal

WILDing the study of developmental trajectories in navigation and wayfinding: Progress and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same journal

WILD kids, cutting-edge research. Enhancing diversity and reflexivity in psychology.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same journal

Ethnographic methods can help psychology overcome its WEIRD problems.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies

Published on: August 4, 2023

Weird people, yes, but also weird experiments.

Nicolas Baumard¹, Dan Sperber

¹Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6PN, United Kingdom. nbaumard@gmail.com

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences

|June 17, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Cultural diversity in psychology research is crucial. However, some cross-cultural studies may misinterpret situational differences as deep psychological variations, particularly in economic games.

More Related Videos

Physiological Experimentation with the Crayfish Hindgut: A Student Laboratory Exercise

Physiological Experimentation with the Crayfish Hindgut: A Student Laboratory Exercise

Published on: January 18, 2011

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies

Published on: August 4, 2023

Physiological Experimentation with the Crayfish Hindgut: A Student Laboratory Exercise

Physiological Experimentation with the Crayfish Hindgut: A Student Laboratory Exercise

Published on: January 18, 2011

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

Area of Science:

Psychology
Cultural Psychology
Behavioral Economics

Background:

Acknowledges the detrimental cultural imbalance in participant recruitment for psychology experiments.
Highlights the potential "weirdness" or misinterpretation in cross-cultural studies.
Points out that observed differences may not stem from inherent psychological traits.

Purpose of the Study:

To caution against overstating cultural differences found in cross-cultural research.
To propose alternative explanations for observed variations in cross-cultural findings.
To examine the role of situational interpretation in cross-cultural economic games.

Main Methods:

Analysis of existing cross-cultural studies, focusing on economic games.
Comparative examination of results from different cultural contexts.
Theoretical exploration of situational interpretation versus inherent psychological differences.

Main Results:

Suggests that apparent deep cultural differences in economic games may be artifacts of interpretation.
Demonstrates how varied situational understandings can lead to diverse game outcomes.
Challenges the direct attribution of observed differences solely to psychological variations.

Conclusions:

Calls for a nuanced approach to interpreting cross-cultural research findings.
Emphasizes the importance of considering situational context and interpretation.
Advocates for refining methodologies in cross-cultural psychology to avoid misattributing differences.