Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026
09:13
Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published on: April 22, 2015
Anatomical and functional differences between the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test and the Symbol Digit Modalities
Cristina Forn1, Antonio Belenguer, Vicente Belloch
1Universitat Jaume I, Departament de Psicologia Basica, Clinica i Psicobiologia, Castello de la Plana, Spain. forn@psb.uji.es
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
|June 17, 2010
Summary
The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) show distinct brain activation patterns, suggesting they assess different cognitive functions in multiple sclerosis patients. PASAT engages more frontal areas, indicating greater executive function involvement.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Clinical Neurology
Background:
- The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) are standard tools for assessing cognitive deficits in multiple sclerosis (MS).
- While both tests are sensitive to slowed information processing, evidence suggests they may tap into different underlying cognitive processes.
- Understanding these differences is crucial for accurate cognitive assessment in MS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the distinct neural correlates of the PASAT and SDMT.
- To elucidate the specific cognitive functions engaged by each test in the context of MS-related cognitive impairment.
- To inform the optimal use of these tests in clinical neuropsychological evaluations.
Main Methods:
- A block-design functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study was conducted with 17 participants.
- Participants completed both the PASAT and SDMT under controlled conditions.
- Statistical analysis involved analysis of variance (ANOVA) with familywise error correction (p < .05, FWE) to compare brain activations between tasks.
Main Results:
- Both PASAT and SDMT elicited significant brain activations in left frontal and parietal regions.
- The PASAT demonstrated greater activation in frontal areas compared to the SDMT.
- These findings suggest that while both tasks involve information transfer across widespread brain networks, the PASAT recruits additional executive functions.
Conclusions:
- The PASAT and SDMT, despite both measuring information processing speed, engage distinct neural networks.
- The enhanced frontal activation during PASAT highlights its greater reliance on executive functions, such as working memory and cognitive control.
- These differential activation patterns support the use of both tests to provide a more comprehensive profile of cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis.
