Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

08:07
A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle
Published on: January 11, 2018
Human temporomandibular joint eminence shape and load minimization
L R Iwasaki1, M J Crosby, D B Marx
1University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics, 650 E. 25th St., Kansas City, MO 64108-2784, USA. iwasakil@umkc.edu
Journal of Dental Research
|June 18, 2010
Summary
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) eminence shapes may not perfectly minimize joint loads, especially with disc displacement. Measured shapes differed from predicted optimal shapes, indicating potential load-related developmental variations.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Orthodontics
- Dental Anatomy
Background:
- Previous research suggested temporomandibular joint (TMJ) eminence shapes develop to minimize joint loads.
- This hypothesis requires further investigation, particularly concerning the influence of TMJ disc displacement on eminence morphology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the hypothesis that TMJ eminence shapes ideally develop to minimize joint loads.
- To compare predicted optimal eminence shapes with measured shapes in individuals with and without TMJ disc displacement.
Main Methods:
- Nineteen participants (9 female, 8 male) were divided into groups with and without TMJ disc displacement.
- Anatomical data were used in a numerical model to predict eminence shapes, and jaw-tracking data were used to measure them.
- Third-order polynomials fitted coordinate data (x,y) for two sessions, sides, and methods (predicted, measured).
Main Results:
- Individuals with TMJ disc displacement exhibited a higher measured shape range (5:1) and left-right asymmetry prevalence (4:1) compared to those without.
- Model-predicted and measured TMJ eminence shapes showed significant differences (P < 0.01) near the eminence crest.
- Joint load minimization was consistent with eminence shape for anterior-posterior distances (x) less than 3.0 mm.
Conclusions:
- The hypothesis that TMJ eminence shapes perfectly minimize joint loads may not hold true, particularly in the presence of disc displacement.
- Significant differences between predicted and measured eminence shapes suggest that factors beyond simple load minimization influence their development.
- Further research is needed to elucidate the complex interplay of factors shaping TMJ eminence morphology.

