Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Random Error01:04

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exposure-induced high-pass filtering of a volume by means of an absorption hologram recording technique.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Variable-cavity-length mode-locked Nd:YAG laser for noncontact generation and spectral control of narrow-band ultrasound.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Full-field vibrometry using a Fabry-Perot étalon interferometer.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

System for high-speed time-resolved holography of transient events.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Dual-beam interferometer for the accurate determination of surface-wave velocity.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Evaluation of alternative algorithms for dynamic imaging microellipsometry.

Applied optics·2010
Same journal

Multifunctional reconfigurable terahertz metasurface based on vanadium dioxide phase transition: achieving broadband absorption and efficient polarization conversion.

Applied optics·2026
Same journal

High-Q-factor electromagnetically induced transparency utilizing quasi-bound states in the continuum in an all-dielectric terahertz metasurface.

Applied optics·2026
Same journal

Automated stitching interferometry for high-precision metrology of X-ray mirrors.

Applied optics·2026
Same journal

Experimental demonstration of an approach to designing a metal-dielectric DBR resonant cavity structure.

Applied optics·2026
Same journal

High-precision wavefront reconstruction from a single-shot interferogram using a physics-driven hybrid feature calibration network.

Applied optics·2026
Same journal

Ultra-high-Q Fano resonance based on coupled topological corner states in Kagome photonic crystals.

Applied optics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Experimental and Data Analysis Workflow for Soft Matter Nanoindentation
13:04

Experimental and Data Analysis Workflow for Soft Matter Nanoindentation

Published on: January 18, 2022

Absolute and random error analysis of the dynamic imaging microellipsometry technique.

R F Cohn, J W Wagner

    Applied Optics
    |June 18, 2010
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Dynamic imaging microellipsometry offers rapid, high-resolution ellipsometric imaging. This study details its theoretical error analysis and calibration methods, validating them with system measurements for improved accuracy.

    More Related Videos

    Echo Particle Image Velocimetry
    16:31

    Echo Particle Image Velocimetry

    Published on: December 27, 2012

    Cooling Rate Dependent Ellipsometry Measurements to Determine the Dynamics of Thin Glassy Films
    09:32

    Cooling Rate Dependent Ellipsometry Measurements to Determine the Dynamics of Thin Glassy Films

    Published on: January 26, 2016

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

    Experimental and Data Analysis Workflow for Soft Matter Nanoindentation
    13:04

    Experimental and Data Analysis Workflow for Soft Matter Nanoindentation

    Published on: January 18, 2022

    Echo Particle Image Velocimetry
    16:31

    Echo Particle Image Velocimetry

    Published on: December 27, 2012

    Cooling Rate Dependent Ellipsometry Measurements to Determine the Dynamics of Thin Glassy Films
    09:32

    Cooling Rate Dependent Ellipsometry Measurements to Determine the Dynamics of Thin Glassy Films

    Published on: January 26, 2016

    Area of Science:

    • Optical physics
    • Materials science
    • Surface analysis

    Background:

    • Ellipsometry is a powerful optical technique for characterizing thin films and surfaces.
    • High-resolution imaging in ellipsometry is crucial for analyzing spatially varying properties.
    • Dynamic imaging microellipsometry (DIM) enables rapid, full-field ellipsometric measurements.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present a summary of the dynamic imaging microellipsometry (DIM) technique.
    • To derive the theoretical basis for a linear sensitivity coefficient approach to error analysis in ellipsometry.
    • To demonstrate the application of sensitivity coefficient maps for ellipsometric data calibration and error analysis.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of a linear sensitivity coefficient approach to quantify error sources.
    • Numerical computation of sensitivity coefficient maps.
    • Analysis of random errors and verification through system measurements.

    Main Results:

    • Theoretical framework for error analysis in DIM established.
    • Sensitivity coefficient maps computed and presented.
    • Experimental verification of theoretical error estimations using system measurements.

    Conclusions:

    • The linear sensitivity coefficient approach provides a robust method for error analysis in DIM.
    • Sensitivity maps are valuable tools for ellipsometric data calibration.
    • The technique and analysis are validated, enhancing the reliability of microellipsometry measurements.