Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Practical Aspects of Sample Preparation and Setup of 1H R1ρ Relaxation Dispersion Experiments of RNA
Published on: July 9, 2021
Accuracy of RBE: experimental and theoretical considerations
T Friedrich1, W Weyrather, T Elsässer
1GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Planckstrasse 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany. t.friedrich@gsi.de
Abstract:
The concept of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is essential for treatment planning in carbon ion therapy and for understanding the biological effects of high-LET radiation. As this quantity depends on many factors, both its experimental determination and the assessment of its uncertainty are not trivial. For the limiting case of zero dose, where the RBE takes its maximum value RBE(alpha), we present in this article a simple empirical-based approach to estimate its uncertainty. A Gaussian error calculus is applied to equally take into account both uncertainties from experiments with high- and low-LET radiation. From a theoretical point of view, we then infer, using a simple Monte Carlo model, the distribution of RBE(alpha) values. This illustrates why the conventional error propagation approach is inappropriate in some cases. In these cases, likewise also the error estimates have to be obtained with a more sophisticated approach. Uncertainties of RBE, visualized by error bars, are of importance for treatment planning and also for setting up a precision goal for predicting biophysical models such as the local effect model.
Related Concept Videos
The Uncertainty Principle
Regression Toward the Mean
Improving Translational Accuracy
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Thomson's e/m Experiment
A particle with charge q, speed v, and mass m enters an area from the top, where the magnetic and electric fields are perpendicular both to the particle's motion and to one another. The magnetic...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

