Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

07:13
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
Published on: November 9, 2018
Preference for a segmented schedule using a brief S+ stimulus correlated with a great delay reduction in humans
Jérôme Alessandri1, Mikaël Molet, Edmund Fantino
1University of Lille, North of France, BP 60149, 59653 Villeneuve d' Ascq Cedex, France. jerome.alessandri@univ-lille3.fr
Behavioural Processes
|June 19, 2010
Summary
Humans now prefer segmented schedules over unsegmented ones in reinforcement tasks. This preference emerges when a brief stimulus signals a greater reduction in delay to reinforcement, aligning with delay-reduction theory.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral psychology
- Animal cognition
- Reinforcement learning
Background:
- Previous studies indicated a preference for unsegmented schedules over segmented ones in pigeons and humans.
- This finding appeared inconsistent with conditioned reinforcement theories, like delay-reduction theory.
Purpose of the Study:
- To resolve the inconsistency between observed preferences and delay-reduction theory.
- To investigate how modifications to segmented schedules affect preference in human participants.
Main Methods:
- Two modifications were made to the standard segmented schedule in human participants.
- The terminal-link stimulus (S+ stimulus) was presented late in the terminal link, closer to reinforcement.
- The S+ stimulus presentation was brief, allowing early terminal-link stimulus reinstatement.
Main Results:
- The study demonstrated a preference for the modified segmented schedule.
- This preference was observed when a brief S+ stimulus was associated with a significant reduction in delay to reinforcement.
Conclusions:
- The findings support delay-reduction theory by showing preference for segmented schedules under specific conditions.
- Modifying segmented schedules, particularly with a brief S+ stimulus, can reverse previously observed preference patterns.

