Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Minimally Invasive Thumb-sized Pterional Craniotomy for Surgical Clip Ligation of Unruptured Anterior Circulation Aneurysms
Published on: August 11, 2015
Treatment of cerebral aneurysms: surgical clipping and coil embolization
Y Kaku1, H Watarai, J Kokuzawa
1Department of Neurosurgery, Asahi University Murakami Memorial Hospital, Gifu, Japan - kaku@murakami.asahi-u.ac.jp.
Insights
Surgical clipping and coil embolization offer effective treatment for cerebral aneurysms. A combined approach may provide the best outcomes for patients with these vascular conditions.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Interventional Neurology
- Vascular Neurology
Background:
- Cerebral aneurysms pose significant risks, including subarachnoid hemorrhage.
- Surgical clipping and endovascular coil embolization are primary treatment modalities.
- Optimal treatment selection requires careful consideration of aneurysm characteristics and patient factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of surgical clipping versus endovascular coil embolization for cerebral aneurysms.
- To evaluate the efficacy and complication rates of both treatment strategies.
- To assess the benefit of a combined microsurgical-endovascular approach.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 76 consecutive patients with cerebral aneurysms treated between January 2004 and March 2006.
- Patients underwent either surgical clipping, endovascular embolization, or a combination.
- Outcomes were assessed based on favorable outcome rates, re-treatment needs, and complication incidence.
Main Results:
- Favorable outcomes were achieved in 73.9% of surgically treated patients and 63.2% of endovascularly treated patients.
- Endovascular treatment required re-treatment in 15.8% of cases, while surgical clipping did not.
- Complication rates were comparable between the two modalities for both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms.
Conclusions:
- Both surgical clipping and endovascular embolization are viable treatment options for cerebral aneurysms.
- Surgical clipping demonstrated a higher rate of favorable outcomes and avoided re-treatment in this series.
- A combined microsurgical-endovascular team approach is recommended for optimal patient management.
Summary:
The present series provides a balanced overview of the treatment of aneurysms in surgical clipping and coil embolization. Between January 2004 and March 2006, 76 consecutive patients with cerebral aneurysms underwent endovascular embolization and/or surgical clipping. Of these, 42 patients suffered an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), while the remaining 34 patients had nonruptured cerebral aneurysms. Of the 23 surgically treated patients, 17 (73.9%) achieved a favorable outcome. Of the 19 patients who underwent endovascular embolization, 12 (63.2%) achieved a favorable outcome. Three patients (15.8%) who underwent endovascular embolization needed to undergo re-treatments, while no re-treatment was needed in the surgically treated patients. Of the 34 nonruptured aneurysms, 12 (35.3%) were treated using surgical clipping, while 22 (64.7%) underwent endovascular embolization. The complication rates of the two treatment modalities demonstrated no significant difference. A combined microsurgical-endovascular team approach is thus considered to provide the most effective means to achieve favorable outcomes for patients with cerebral aneurysms.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care

