Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Parents' views of involvement in concurrent research with their neonates
1University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, NJMS-UH Cancer Center, 205 South Orange Ave., Room C-1243, Newark, NJ 07103, USA. wardf1@umdnj.edu
Insights
Parents of critically ill neonates found concurrent research interviews acceptable during infant clinical trial decisions. While acceptable for themselves, they perceived potential burdens for other parents, suggesting social comparison influences perceptions.
Area of Science:
- Bioethics
- Neonatal Research
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Understanding parental decision-making in neonatal clinical trials is crucial for researchers and bioethicists.
- Parents' emotional states during these decisions warrant further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the perceived burden of concurrent research interviews on parents deciding on neonatal clinical trial enrollment.
- To explore parents' views on the acceptability and value of such research.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative descriptive study involving 27 parents of critically ill neonates.
- Interviews were conducted, audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using content analysis.
Main Results:
- Parents generally found concurrent research interviews acceptable for themselves.
- Participants also indicated that such research might be perceived as problematic by others.
- Risk preference and social comparison theories may help explain these parental perceptions.
Conclusions:
- Concurrent research interviews during neonatal clinical trial decision-making are perceived as acceptable by some parents.
- Parental perceptions of research burden may be influenced by social comparison and risk preferences.
- Further research is needed to fully understand the nuances of parental experiences in clinical trial participation.
Abstract:
It would be useful to researchers and bioethicists to know more about parents' decision processes and emotional state during the time they are deciding whether to enroll their infant in a clinical trial. The aim of this research study was to discover whether parents who had been previously asked to enroll their neonates in clinical trials would have found concurrent research about their decision-making overly burdensome. Twenty-seven parents of critically ill neonates who had been approached for their child's research participation in a clinical trial were asked what they believed about the potential burden or value of being interviewed during the time of research decision-making about their infant's participation. For this qualitative descriptive study, interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using content analysis techniques. Participants considered concurrent research acceptable for them but potentially problematic for others. Theories of risk preferences and social comparison might explain these findings.
Related Concept Videos
Parental Care
The Nativist Approach
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Stella Chess...
Relationship with Parents: Attachment
Ethics in Research

