Related Concept Videos
00:59Uncertainty: Overview
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
04:08The Uncertainty Principle
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He mathematically...
00:59Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
03:37Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
01:10Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...
00:54Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Sort by
Same author
Imagine the Feeling: An Aesthetic Science of Psychology.
Integrative psychological & behavioral science·2014
Same author
Teaching about mental health and illness through the history of the DSM.
History of psychology·2013
Same author
What is in a name? Understanding the implications of participant terminology.
Integrative psychological & behavioral science·2008
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026
09:07
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
Published on: September 16, 2015
Uncertainty as a fundamental scientific value.
1Psychology Department, John Jay College, CUNY, 899 Tenth Avenue, New York, NY, 10019, USA, jclegg@jjay.cuny.edu.
Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science
|June 24, 2010
Summary
Social sciences often avoid uncertainty, hindering new knowledge. Embracing ambiguity and mystery is crucial for scientific progress and discovery in social science research.
Area of Science:
- Social Sciences
- Philosophy of Science
Background:
- Social scientists often express discomfort with uncertainty and ambiguity, despite valuing tolerance for ambiguity.
- This discomfort may stem from a misinterpretation of classical physical sciences, overlooking their critical and radical foundations.
Discussion:
- The pursuit of certainty in science can be unscientific, merely restating existing knowledge and inhibiting novel discoveries.
- Uncertainty, conversely, is presented as a positive, generative condition that fosters discovery and openness to the unknown.
Key Insights:
- A distorted view of physical sciences contributes to social sciences' aversion to uncertainty.
- Certainty-driven knowledge can become dogmatic, preventing the development of genuinely new insights.
Outlook:
- Social sciences can advance by protecting and cultivating uncertainty through localized, concrete discourse.
- A self-reflective and self-critical research praxis is essential for embracing the mystery inherent in social systems.