Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Measuring the impact and costs of a universal group based parenting programme: protocol and implementation of a trial
Douglas E Simkiss1, Helen A Snooks, Nigel Stallard
1Health Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, England. d.e.simkiss@warwick.ac.uk
Insights
This study evaluates the Family Links Nurturing Programme (FLNP), a universal parenting program, using a randomized controlled trial. It aims to provide evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of FLNP for improving family well-being.
Area of Science:
- Parenting and Child Development
- Public Health Interventions
- Health Economics
Background:
- Sub-optimal parenting is a significant risk factor for adverse health, social, and educational outcomes.
- Existing parenting programs often focus on behavior management for targeted groups.
- The Family Links Nurturing Programme (FLNP) uniquely emphasizes family relationships and universal delivery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a multi-centre, randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the FLNP.
- To assess the effectiveness of FLNP on parenting, parent-child relations, and well-being.
- To evaluate the economic impact and implementation challenges of the FLNP.
Main Methods:
- A multi-centre, investigator-blind RCT involving 288 families with children aged 2-4 years.
- Validated measures assessed changes in parenting and well-being immediately and at 6 months post-intervention.
- Included cost-consequence and cost-utility analyses, attendance/fidelity monitoring, and a nested qualitative study.
Main Results:
- Recruitment of 287 families was achieved by May 2010, though not meeting planned timescales.
- Identified barriers to recruitment included professional and family concerns, and research governance procedures.
- The study protocol and implementation challenges are described, with strategies for addressing them.
Conclusions:
- Universal parenting programs like FLNP have theoretical benefits but lack robust RCT evidence.
- This RCT protocol, incorporating quantitative, qualitative, and economic measures, aims to provide clear evidence on FLNP's effectiveness and costs.
- The study highlights and addresses challenges in implementing universal parenting program trials.
Background:
Sub-optimal parenting is a common risk factor for a wide range of negative health, social and educational outcomes. Most parenting programmes have been developed in the USA in the context of delinquency prevention for targeted or indicated groups and the main theoretical underpinning for these programmes is behaviour management. The Family Links Nurturing Programme (FLNP) focuses on family relationships as well as behaviour management and is offered on a universal basis. As a result it may be better placed to improve health and educational outcomes. Developed in the UK voluntary sector, FLNP is popular with practitioners, has impressed policy makers throughout the UK, has been found to be effective in before/after and qualitative studies, but lacks a randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence base.
Methods/Design:
A multi-centre, investigator blind, randomised controlled trial of the FLNP with a target sample of 288 south Wales families who have a child aged 2-4 yrs living in or near to Flying Start/Sure Start areas. Changes in parenting, parent child relations and parent and child wellbeing are assessed with validated measures immediately and at 6 months post intervention. Economic components include cost consequences and cost utility analyses based on parental ranking of states of quality of life. Attendance and completion rates and fidelity to the FLNP course delivery are assessed. A nested qualitative study will assess reasons for participation and non-participation and the perceived value of the programme to families. By the end of May 2010, 287 families have been recruited into the trial across four areas of south Wales. Recruitment has not met the planned timescales with barriers including professional anxiety about families entering the control arm of the trial, family concern about video and audio recording, programme facilitator concern about the recording of FLNP sessions for fidelity purposes and delays due to the new UK research governance procedures.
Discussion:
Whilst there are strong theoretical arguments to support universal provision of parenting programmes, few universal programmes have been subjected to randomised controlled trials. In this paper we describe a RCT protocol with quantitative and qualitative outcome measures and an economic evaluation designed to provide clear evidence with regard to effectiveness and costs. We describe challenges implementing the protocol and how we are addressing these.
Trial Registration:
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN13919732.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Group Design
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...

