Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

06:50
A High-Throughput Electrochemiluminescence 7-Plex Assay Simultaneously Screening for Type 1 Diabetes and Multiple Autoimmune Diseases
Published on: May 29, 2020
Autoantibodies to double-stranded DNA--intermethod comparison between four commercial immunoassays and a research
1Institut für Klinische Chemie und Pathobiochemie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany.
Lupus
|June 29, 2010
Summary
This study compared four commercial assays and a novel surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor for detecting anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. The Bindazyme assay showed the highest diagnostic accuracy, while SPR offers potential for real-time monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Clinical Chemistry
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Antibodies to double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) are key serological markers for diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
- Accurate detection of anti-dsDNA is crucial for SLE diagnosis and patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of four commercial anti-dsDNA immunoassays.
- To assess a novel surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor for anti-dsDNA detection.
- To compare these methods, particularly in SLE patients with lupus nephritis.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of anti-dsDNA measurements in 50 SLE patients, 39 with other autoimmune diseases, and 20 healthy controls.
- Utilized Receiver-Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine diagnostic accuracies (Area Under the Curve - AUC, Diagnostic Efficiency - DE).
- Compared four commercial immunoassays (Bindazyme, ELiA, Farrzyme, Farr) against an in-house SPR biosensor.
Main Results:
- All tested immunoassays demonstrated satisfactory overall diagnostic accuracy for anti-dsDNA detection.
- Bindazyme assay yielded the highest AUC (0.89) and DE (0.88).
- For lupus nephritis patients, Bindazyme (AUC 0.98) and ELiA (AUC 0.95) showed superior performance; SPR biosensor also performed well (AUC 0.93).
Conclusions:
- Commercial immunoassays provide reliable anti-dsDNA detection for SLE diagnosis.
- The Bindazyme assay exhibited the best diagnostic performance among the evaluated methods.
- The SPR biosensor shows promise as a complementary technique for real-time monitoring of antigen/antibody interactions in SLE.

