Aortic dilatation in patients with prosthetic aortic valve: comparison of MRI and echocardiography
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

In vitro Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation Using Four-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: February 25, 2022
Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff1, André Rudolph, Ralf Wassmuth
1Working Group Cardiac MRI, Medical University Berlin, Charité Campus Buch, Franz-Volhard-Klinik for Cardiology, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany. florian.von-knobelsdorff@charite.de
Background And Aim Of The Study:
Patients with prosthetic aortic valve have an increased risk for aortic dissection, which rises further with growing aortic diameters. Thus, accurate aortic monitoring is required. As transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), the current clinical standard, is frequently restricted to the proximal ascending aorta, the use of two-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance (2D-CMR) in transverse orientation was investigated as a screening tool to assess ascending aortic dimensions.
Methods:
Fast, non-contrast-enhanced, non-breath-hold, steady-state free-precession (SSFP) sequences (1.5 Tesla, slice thickness 7 mm, gap 1.8 mm, scan time 10-15 s) were applied to image the thorax in transverse planes. To test the accuracy of aortic dimensions obtained in this way, comparison was made to contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography (3D-MRA) as the 'gold standard' in 30 patients with aortic or aortic valve disease. After validation, transverse 2D-CMR was used to assess ascending aortic dimensions in 65 patients with aortic bioprostheses, and the results were compared to those acquired with TTE.
Results:
Data acquired with both 2D-CMR and 3D-MRA agreed well when assessing ascending aortic diameters (r = 0.99; p < 0.001; mean difference 0.1 +/- 0.1 cm). In patients with bioprostheses, the image quality was diagnostic in 100% of cases for 2D-CMR, and in 93.4% for TTE. The ascending aortic diameter by 2D-CMR (mean 3.8 +/- 0.5 cm; range: 2.6-5.0 cm) was larger (p < 0.001) than by TTE (3.3 +/- 0.6 cm; range: 2.3-4.9 cm). Aortic dilatation (diameter, indexed by body surface area, > 2.1 cm/m2) was present in 38.5% of 2D-CMR cases and in 11.5% of TTE cases. The intra- and inter-observer variabilities to assess aortic dimensions by 2D-CMR were 2.1 +/- 1.9% and 4.3 +/- 3.7%, respectively.
Conclusion:
Imaging of the complete thorax in transverse orientation using fast, non-contrast-enhanced SSFP images provided an accurate and reliable approach to screen for aortic dilatation. In patients with aortic bioprostheses, 2D-CMR revealed a high prevalence of aortic dilatation, which was considerably underestimated by TTE.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for diagnosing...
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI

