Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laboratory differences in cervical cytology.

C M Rutledge1, R V van Wolkenten, J S Levin

  • 1Department of Family and Community Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk.

Family Practice Research Journal
|June 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Religion and health in Mexican Americans.

Journal of religion and health·2013
Same author

Is there a religious factor in health?

Journal of religion and health·2013
Same author

Religion, Type A behavior, and health.

Journal of religion and health·2013
Same author

Religion and medicine: How are they related?

Journal of religion and health·2013
Same author

A critique of the life style concept in public health education.

International quarterly of community health education·2010
Same author

Mental health services in faith communities: the role of clergy in black churches.

Social work·2000
Same journal

Consideration of venue and vehicle in health behavior research with adolescents.

Family practice research journal·1994
Same journal

Desirable features of qualitative research.

Family practice research journal·1994
Same journal

Prenatal and postpartum Pap smears: do we need both?

Family practice research journal·1994
Same journal

Inadvertent administration of DTP and DT after age six as recorded in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.

Family practice research journal·1994
Same journal

Information and communication about overweight in family practice.

Family practice research journal·1994
Same journal

Screening women in family practice settings: association between depression and smoking cigarettes.

Family practice research journal·1994
See all related articles

Laboratories show significant differences in reporting endocervical cells on Papanicolaou smears. This variation in Pap smear analysis persists even after accounting for patient and collection factors.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecologic pathology
  • Laboratory medicine
  • Public health

Background:

  • Papanicolaou (Pap) smears are crucial for cervical cancer screening.
  • Reporting of endocervical cells in Pap smears is an indicator of specimen adequacy.
  • Variability in laboratory reporting practices may impact screening effectiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate differences in the reporting of endocervical cells in Papanicolaou smears among laboratories serving an urban, academic family practice.
  • To address a gap in the literature regarding inter-laboratory comparison of Pap smear results for endocervical cell presence.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective study evaluating 140 Papanicolaou smears from women aged 16–83.
  • Smears were analyzed by three different laboratories for the presence of endocervical cells.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical analysis included analysis of variance (ANOVA) and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).
  • Main Results:

    • A statistically significant difference (p < .001) was observed in the frequency of reporting endocervical cells across the three laboratories.
    • Reported presence of endocervical cells varied widely, from 50.6% to 91.3% among laboratories.
    • ANCOVA, controlling for age, menstrual cycle phase, collection method, and clinician experience, did not explain the observed inter-laboratory differences.

    Conclusions:

    • Significant inter-laboratory variability exists in reporting endocervical cells on Papanicolaou smears.
    • This variability is not explained by known factors influencing smear quality or patient characteristics.
    • Further investigation is warranted to understand and standardize Pap smear evaluation criteria for optimal cervical cancer screening.