Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Longitudinal Studies

Longitudinal Studies

Longitudinal studies are also widely used in other medical and social science fields. For instance, in cardiovascular research, they can monitor patients' health over decades to identify risk factors for heart disease, such as high cholesterol or smoking, and evaluate the long-term effectiveness of preventive measures. Similarly, in mental health studies, researchers might follow individuals from adolescence into adulthood to understand the development and progression of conditions like...

Longitudinal Research

Longitudinal Research

Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...

Introduction To Survival Analysis

Introduction To Survival Analysis

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to study time-to-event data, where the "event" might represent outcomes like death, disease relapse, system failure, or recovery. A unique feature of survival data is censoring, which occurs when the event of interest has not been observed for some individuals during the study period. This requires specialized techniques to handle incomplete data effectively.
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time until a...

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Simultaneous Zn<sup>2+</sup> tracking in multiple organelles using super-resolution morphology-correlated organelle identification in living cells.

Nature communications·2021

Same author

Improving the thermostability of a GH11 xylanase by directed evolution and rational design guided by B-factor analysis.

Enzyme and microbial technology·2020

Same author

Progresses in clinical studies on antiviral therapies for COVID-19-Experience and lessons in design of clinical trials.

Pediatric investigation·2020

Same author

Coordination of Ligand-Protected Metal Nanoclusters and Glass Nanopipettes: Conversion of a Liquid-Phase Fluorometric Assay into an Enhanced Nanopore Analysis.

Analytical chemistry·2020

Same author

Evaluation of Cannabinoids on the Odonto/Osteogenesis in Human Dental Pulp Cells In Vitro.

Journal of endodontics·2020

Same author

The lncRNA <i>UBE2R2-AS1</i> suppresses cervical cancer cell growth <i>in vitro</i>.

Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland)·2020

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Statistical issues in longitudinal data analysis for treatment efficacy studies in the biomedical sciences.

Chunyan Liu¹, Timothy P Cripe, Mi-Ok Kim

¹Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA.

Molecular Therapy : the Journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy

|July 1, 2010

Summary

Statistical analysis of longitudinal data in cell biology and gene therapy is often flawed. Mixed effects models are recommended over separate analyses of time points to improve accuracy and avoid false positives in research.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Cell biology
Gene therapy
Biostatistics

Background:

Longitudinal data collection is prevalent in cell biology and gene therapy research.
Current statistical practices for analyzing this data are often inadequate.
A survey revealed common but suboptimal analysis methods in published studies.

Purpose of the Study:

To review current statistical analysis practices for longitudinal data in cell biology and gene therapy.
To identify the most effective statistical method for analyzing longitudinal outcomes.
To recommend improved analytical approaches for researchers in these fields.

Main Methods:

Survey of statistical methods used in Molecular Therapy publications.
Simulation study to evaluate the performance of different statistical approaches.
Comparison of analysis of variance (ANOVA) with mixed effects models.
Discussion of multiple comparison adjustments for correlated longitudinal data.

Main Results:

A small fraction of studies properly analyze longitudinal data.
The most common method, cross-sectional ANOVA with Tukey's tests, is suboptimal.
This approach fails to leverage the full power of longitudinal study designs.
Separate time-point analysis can lead to a false positivity rate as high as 30%.

Conclusions:

Mixed effects models are recommended as a superior method for analyzing longitudinal data.
Resampling is suggested for adjusting post hoc testing to maintain statistical power.
Accurate statistical analysis is crucial for reliable cell biology and gene therapy research findings.