Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes
Published on: February 23, 2024
Comparison of the VCTS-6500 and the CSV-1000 tests for visual contrast sensitivity testing
Sandra Franco1, Ana Carolina Silva, Ana Sofia Carvalho
1Centre/Department of Physics (Optometry), University of Minho, Braga, Portugal. sfranco@fisica.uminho.pt
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to analyze if differences exist between two available contrast sensitivity tests that use similar stimuli, specifically, the CSV-1000 (VectorVision, Greenville, OH)) and the VCTS-6500 (Vistech, Dayton, OH). Contrast sensitivity was measured on 105 healthy patients with ages ranged from 19 to 26 years with visual acuity of 20/25 or better. The tests were performed in the same room and contrast sensitivity was measured with the VCTS-6500 system and CSV-1000. For both tests, the spatial frequencies of 3, 6, 12 and 18 cycles per degree were recorded. Contrast sensitivity values were generally higher for the Vistech VCTS-6500 test being the difference statistically significant (p<0.001) for all the spatial frequencies. This difference was more significant for 3cpd spatial frequency and the two tests showed a better agreement for the 6cpd spatial frequency. Our results showed that there were significant differences between the VCTS-6500 and the CSV-1000 tests. Developments of some general recommendations or regulations in relation to clinical measurement of contrast sensitivity are necessary.
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Comparison Tests

