Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Evidence for Evolution02:55

The Evidence for Evolution

Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.The collection of fossils within sedimentary rocks give a record of common ancestry and often depicts the history of evolution.
Psychology as a Science01:13

Psychology as a Science

Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be safely...
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2024
Same author

Personal Opinions are Misplaced Here.

Deutsches Arzteblatt international·2023
Same author

Authors' reply to Morales and Arlett.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2023
Same author

Replacing RCTs with real world data for regulatory decision making: a self-fulfilling prophecy?

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2023
Same author

The Range and Scientific Value of Randomized Trials.

Deutsches Arzteblatt international·2017
Same author

There is no reverse hierarchy (letter commenting: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(11):1251--1260.).

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2016
Same journal

[Supportive care needs in patients with incurable cancer: Results of an integrative data analysis].

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2026
Same journal

["Bringing one's own unique perspective into research" - Participants' experiences and perceptions regarding the implementation of a citizen advisory board in general practice research].

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2026
Same journal

Developing a non-pharmacological pain management toolkit in nursing homes using a structured evidence-generation approach.

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2026
Same journal

[Between proximity and need: Determinants of longer travel times to emergency departments - A sub-evaluation of the utilisation survey in Bavarian emergency departments].

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2026
Same journal

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2026
Same journal

[Patient involvement in clinical research: An explorative interview study on researchers' perspectives, barriers, and support needs].

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

[When do we need scientific evidence?].

Jürgen Windeler1

  • 1Medizinischer Dienst des Spitzenverbandes Bund der Krankenkassen e.V. Essen. j.windeler@MDS-ev.de

Zeitschrift Fur Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen
|July 9, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Claims about the low probability of research findings being true are unfounded. Evaluating the information gained from new clinical trial results helps determine when trials are necessary.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Clinical research methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Evidence-based medicine

Context:

  • Clinical research often involves assessing the probability of a research claim being true.
  • Misinterpretations of this probability can lead to unfounded conclusions about research limitations.

Purpose:

  • To critically evaluate claims regarding the probability of research findings being true.
  • To explore the utility of assessing additional information from new trial results.
  • To determine optimal conditions for conducting clinical trials.

Summary:

  • The assertion that the probability of a research claim being true is inherently low is statistically unfounded.
  • Focus should shift from this probability to the value of additional information provided by new trial results.
  • This approach aids in deciding the necessity and context for conducting clinical trials.

Impact:

  • Challenges common misconceptions in clinical research interpretation.
  • Provides a framework for more rational decision-making regarding clinical trial conduct.
  • Enhances the efficiency and validity of clinical research practices.