Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Radiofrequency/microwave protection guides.

R C Petersen1

  • 1AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974-2070.

Health Physics
|July 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Exposure limits for radiofrequency (RF) and microwave electromagnetic fields have evolved. Recent updates reflect new bioeffect knowledge and dosimetry advances, addressing past criticisms and controversies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Donanemab: Appropriate use recommendations.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2025
Same author

Clinical Meaningfulness in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials. A Report from the EU-US CTAD Task Force.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2024
Same author

Continuous Associations between Remote Self-Administered Cognitive Measures and Imaging Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease..·2024
Same author

A Pragmatic, Investigator-Driven Process for Disclosure of Amyloid PET Scan Results to ADNI-4 Research Participants.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2024
Same author

Lecanemab: Appropriate Use Recommendations.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2023
Same author

Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trial Research Adaptation Following COVID-19 Pandemic Onset: National Sample of Alzheimer's Clinical Trial Consortium Sites.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2022
Same journal

Assessment of Health Risks of Adults and Children Due to Consumption of Uranium in Groundwater from Chengalpattu District, Tamil Nadu, India.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Radiation Protection Abstracts, Volume 46, Number 1.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Specialized Radiological Assets for Navigable Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Virtual and Augmented Reality.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

DoseBusters: A Fully Immersive Virtual Reality Game for Radiation Protection and Detection.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Radioactivity in Bottled Drinking Water from Greater Dhaka City and Concomitant Ingestion Doses to Consumers.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Assessment of Radiation Dose and Protection Practices in Neonatal Radiography in NICUs.

Health physics·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Biophysics
  • Electromagnetism
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure limits, particularly for RF and microwave frequencies, have faced criticism.
  • Controversies often stem from a lack of definitive safety proof, application misunderstandings, and unfamiliarity with the development rationale and approval consensus.
  • Previous exposure limits, established in the 1950s, remained largely unchanged for decades.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the evolution of EMF exposure criteria over the past decade.
  • To emphasize the underlying scientific rationale and consensus process behind updated limits.
  • To address criticisms and controversies surrounding RF and microwave exposure guidelines.

Main Methods:

  • Review of exposure criteria developed by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the scientific literature on bioeffects of EMF exposure.
  • Examination of advancements in dosimetry and exposure assessment techniques.

    • Main Results:

    • Exposure limits have been extensively modified in the last decade.
    • Modifications incorporate increased knowledge of bioeffects and improved dosimetry.
    • Updated guidelines aim to overcome shortcomings of earlier exposure guides.

    Conclusions:

    • Recent revisions to EMF exposure limits are based on a stronger scientific foundation.
    • Understanding the rationale and consensus process is crucial for addressing public concerns.
    • The updated criteria provide a more robust framework for managing RF and microwave exposure.