Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
Published on: May 23, 2020
An implant-transfer technique without impression material
Wirley Gonçalves Assunção1, Erica Alves Gomes, Juliana Aparecida Delben
1Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil 16015-050. wirley@foa.unesp.br
This article introduces a new method for creating implant-supported prostheses that does not require traditional impression materials. Instead, it uses splinted transfer copings to transfer implant positions directly to a modified preliminary cast. This process eliminates the need for tissue impressions and may be faster and simpler than conventional methods. The technique involves placing analogs in corrected implant positions on the preliminary cast to form a master cast. The authors suggest that this approach may improve efficiency in dental laboratories and reduce clinical time. The method focuses solely on implant positioning and does not involve recording surrounding tissues.
Area of Science:
- Dental prosthetics and restorative dentistry
- Clinical dental techniques
- Dental implantology
Background:
Current dental practices rely on various transfer impression techniques to create accurate working casts for implant-supported prostheses. While traditional methods use impression materials to capture implant positions and surrounding tissues, alternative approaches have been proposed to streamline the process. Prior research has shown that splinted transfer copings can be used to replicate implant positions without the need for impression material. However, a gap remains in understanding how to modify preliminary casts directly to form a master cast without tissue impressions. This uncertainty drives the need for a simplified and efficient technique that avoids the use of impression materials while maintaining accuracy. No prior work had resolved how to achieve this with minimal steps and without tissue involvement. The field lacks a clear, tissue-independent method that is both time-efficient and clinically practical. This gap motivated the development of a new approach that bypasses traditional impression techniques. That uncertainty drove the exploration of a splinted transfer coping system that could be applied directly to a modified preliminary cast. The absence of a streamlined, tissue-free transfer method remains a key challenge in implant prosthetics.
Purpose Of The Study:
This study aims to describe a novel transfer technique for implant-supported prostheses that eliminates the need for impression material. The specific problem addressed is the inefficiency and complexity of traditional impression-based methods. The motivation stems from the desire to reduce clinical time and simplify the transfer process. The goal is to use splinted transfer copings to directly create a master cast without tissue impressions. The authors propose that this method could improve workflow efficiency in dental laboratories. The study focuses on whether a preliminary cast can be modified to form a master cast using only splinted transfer copings. The authors suggest that this approach may be less time-consuming and more practical than conventional methods. The study does not aim to record adjacent tissues, but rather to focus solely on implant positioning.
Main Methods:
The technique involves the use of splinted transfer copings to transfer implant positions to a laboratory setting. A preliminary cast is modified to accommodate analogs placed in corrected implant positions. No impression material is used in this process. The analogs are positioned according to the corrected implant layout. The master cast is then created from this modified preliminary cast. The method relies on direct modification rather than tissue impressions. Splinted transfer copings are used to ensure accurate analog placement. The authors propose that this method simplifies the transfer process by eliminating the need for impression material. The procedure is described in both clinical and laboratory settings.
Main Results:
The technique successfully transfers implant positions using splinted transfer copings and a modified preliminary cast. The master cast is created without the use of impression material. The authors suggest that this method is less time-consuming than traditional techniques. It does not require recording of adjacent tissues, which simplifies the process. The preliminary cast is adjusted to reflect the corrected implant positions. Analog placement is guided by the splinted transfer copings. The method may reduce clinical and laboratory time. The authors propose that this approach may be more practical for implant-supported prostheses.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that this implant transfer technique may be a viable alternative to traditional impression-based methods. It does not require impression material or tissue recordings. The method may be less time-consuming and easier to perform. The preliminary cast is modified directly to form the master cast. The use of splinted transfer copings ensures accurate analog placement. The authors suggest that this approach may improve workflow efficiency in dental laboratories. The technique may be suitable for cases where tissue impressions are not necessary. The authors propose that this method may be a practical solution for implant-supported prostheses.
Frequently Asked Questions
The authors propose that this method may reduce clinical time and simplify the transfer process by eliminating the need for impression material.
The master cast is created by modifying a preliminary cast to place analogs in corrected implant positions using splinted transfer copings.
The authors suggest that tissue recording is not necessary because the focus is solely on transferring implant positions.
Splinted transfer copings are used to ensure accurate analog placement on the modified preliminary cast.
The authors propose that this method may be less time-consuming and more practical than traditional impression-based methods.
The authors suggest that this method may be a practical solution for implant-supported prostheses when tissue impressions are not required.

